I wonder what Ferris is doing today?
c.f. The Catcher in the Rye - a dreadful book with cult status. How can a book so short (an eye-gouging 234 pages), be so TEDIOUS...?terrible film, how it has cult status is beyond me.
carpe diemterrible film, how it has cult status is beyond me.
Nothing wrong with 'The Catcher in the Rye', but you have to read it when you're the right age. Read it after you've had you're own kids and you'll just wish Holden would just realise that all of the others around him are people too, not just non playable characters in his personal video game. As far as Salinger goes, the short stories are where the gold is. 'A Perfect Day for Bananafish' is up there with a couple of Damon Runyan's and Flannery O'Connor's as my favourite short stories ever.c.f. The Catcher in the Rye - a dreadful book with cult status. How can a book so short (an eye-gouging 234 pages), be so TEDIOUS...?
Maybe they needed to make a parallel movie at the time.Nothing wrong with 'The Catcher in the Rye', but you have to read it when you're the right age. Read it after you've had you're own kids and you'll just wish Holden would just realise that all of the others around him are people too, not just non playable characters in his personal video game. As far as Salinger goes, the short stories are where the gold is. 'A Perfect Day for Bananafish' is up there with a couple of Damon Runyan's and Flannery O'Connor's as my favourite short stories ever.
I hate Ferris Bueller. He is a representation of everything that was wrong with the eighties. Style over substance, short-term risk taking with other people's lives, glib charisma mistaken for real worth and a total lack of responsibility for the consequences of actions. He is the embodiment of Maradona's hand of god goal (90s admittedly), of Thatcher's selling off of North Sea Oil and public industry, of Reagan's man of the people act hiding his evil intent. His sister and headteacher were strivers trampled by his selfish psychopathy. He obviously grew up to become Patrick Bateman and his music taste remained just as awful. I may have thought too much about this.
Ferris Bueller's Day Off isn't about Ferris Bueller, it's about Cameron Frye. In your analogy in a film about Maradona's hand of god, it would actually be about Peter Reid.Nothing wrong with 'The Catcher in the Rye', but you have to read it when you're the right age. Read it after you've had you're own kids and you'll just wish Holden would just realise that all of the others around him are people too, not just non playable characters in his personal video game. As far as Salinger goes, the short stories are where the gold is. 'A Perfect Day for Bananafish' is up there with a couple of Damon Runyan's and Flannery O'Connor's as my favourite short stories ever.
I hate Ferris Bueller. He is a representation of everything that was wrong with the eighties. Style over substance, short-term risk taking with other people's lives, glib charisma mistaken for real worth and a total lack of responsibility for the consequences of actions. He is the embodiment of Maradona's hand of god goal (90s admittedly), of Thatcher's selling off of North Sea Oil and public industry, of Reagan's man of the people act hiding his evil intent. His sister and headteacher were strivers trampled by his selfish psychopathy. He obviously grew up to become Patrick Bateman and his music taste remained just as awful. I may have thought too much about this.
I wonder what Ferris is doing today?
This reinterpretation has developed over the years, but if you saw it back in the middle of the decade of the individual, it's intent and impact were obvious. Nobody was celebrating Cameron. He was a supporting player. All it's fans were Ferris fans. I'd say to you what I say to everyone who argues this interpetation: Read up on John Hughes's politics.Ferris Bueller's Day Off isn't about Ferris Bueller, it's about Cameron Frye. In your analogy in a film about Maradona's hand of god, it would actually be about Peter Reid.
Ferris is intentionally almost mythical in good fortune and his own happiness; the beautiful girlfriend, popular, not a care in the world, no consequences is all counterpoint to the cultural awkwardness, anger, undeserved privilege, feeling of neglect or connection with his parents and lack of being able to belong or be happy that Cameron feels. He is the film. He fears the world, his Dad, his place in it and in the end he smashes this symbol of wealth, capitalism, his father's love his Ferrari beyond repair - the only point in the film he appears content is the moment he accepts he and his Dad will have a little chat about the smashed car.
I don't think it's a film about 80s excess at all, quite the opposite, at the heart of it, despite all the American Dream could give him it is about an unhappy awkward anxious teenager he's only real need in the world was his father's love.
Reading up on John Hughes's politics is like not listening to The Smiths because of what Morrissey has become later in life.This reinterpretation has developed over the years, but if you saw it back in the middle of the decade of the individual, it's intent and impact were obvious. Nobody was celebrating Cameron. He was a supporting player. All it's fans were Ferris fans. I'd say to you what I say to everyone who argues this interpetation: Read up on John Hughes's politics.
Rumblefish, The Outsiders, Breakfast ClubLoved that film . So many classic fun teenager type films made in the 1980’s , pretty in pink , outsiders , St Elmo’s fire , mannequin , about last night etc
Far better than most of the films made nowdays .
Hughes didn't become conservative with age. He was always conservative. Where there were messages in his films, they were conservative. That's not inherently a problem, and some of his films are great fun. I'm just suggesting that an eighties republican would have been less likely to make a critique of the ideals of capitalist America, so subtle that it's true message was only found by film geeks decades later, than he was to make a big fun celebration of the individual sticking it to the established order.Reading up on John Hughes's politics is like not listening to The Smiths because of what Morrissey has become later in life.
St Elmo's features some classic stuff. Rob Lowe gets some girl pregnant and cheerfully bins off the relationship to go off playing his sax and travelling or similar, all smiles and the heartthrob hero. Very much of its time. You just wouldn’t get away with that misogynistic film making now.Loved that film . So many classic fun teenager type films made in the 1980’s , pretty in pink , outsiders , St Elmo’s fire , mannequin , about last night etc
Far better than most of the films made nowdays .
No one really knew about Hughes's politics until much later - so looking for all these conservative messages is a reinterpretation anyway. Films like Vacation literally lampoon the ideas of living the dream, the idea of a father not being about to take his kids to Disneyland, it's brilliant because ultimately it's just a film about being a good Dad and husband.Hughes didn't become conservative with age. He was always conservative. Where there were messages in his films, they were conservative. That's not inherently a problem, and some of his films are great fun. I'm just suggesting that an eighties republican would have been less likely to make a critique of the ideals of capitalist America, so subtle that it's true message was only found by film geeks decades later, than he was to make a big fun celebration of the individual sticking it to the established order.
100% on The Breakfast Club, that stupid fugging dance Emilio Estevez does is almost as appalling as the OP's taste in film and television. Just awful.I don't mind Ferris Bueller's Day Off. I've always found it quite entertaining. Although, I was too young to see it when it came out, so I missed the cult following.
The Breakfast Club, on the other hand, is really not very good. I don't understand how there is so much love for that.