stewart12
Well-known member
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,919
yes, I imagine most GPs do work full time hours, just not necessarily at one surgeryProbably doing private work. A surgeon I had through BUPA was 3 days NHS, 2 days private
yes, I imagine most GPs do work full time hours, just not necessarily at one surgeryProbably doing private work. A surgeon I had through BUPA was 3 days NHS, 2 days private
From my experience, none of the GP surgery's in B&H are coping particularly well at the moment, and their ability to cope varies. Not just on efficiency but also the demographics of the area that they serve gives different pressures on different surgeriesReading through these it seems it is not political but down to the efficiency of the individual surgeries.
Individual policy and processes certainly differ and have an impact on the level of service given but the wider issue is political , its not just funding its about the whole structure and leadership. Its missing and its not helped by a Tory government who see medical health as a potential cash cow.Reading through these it seems it is not political but down to the efficiency of the individual surgeries.
or the technology that actually communicates from one department to another, let alone one surgery/hospital to another within the same authorityIndividual policy and processes certainly differ and have an impact on the level of service given but the wider issue is political , its not just funding its about the whole structure and leadership. Its missing and its not helped by a Tory government who see medical health as a potential cash cow.
GPs passing patients over to an already overworked A&E isn't doing A&E any favours. The system needs completely rebalancing, we have the technology to do wonderful things but often don't have specialist workers e.g. radiologists to use machine we have.
It was specifically better before Tony Blair gifted them more money to work fewer hours, but don't let a fact get in the way of the NSC left wing narrative.My local GP is absolutely terrible. To get an appointment, you have to call at 8am sharp and even then you are likely to be as far back as 25th in the queue. And you can forget seeing your GP that week unless you're at risk of death.
I've given up. Luckily my local hospital is only 10 mins down the road and has an on call GP. I use that if I have to go at all.
Needless to say, it was all noticeably better before the Tories took charge.
I'll just leave this here:It was specifically better before Tony Blair gifted them more money to work fewer hours, but don't let a fact get in the way of the NSC left wing narrative.
that I see as part of the organisation..... i am aware at one point Royal Sussex had two radiologists available but 3 machines because they had an acute shortage of them. They don't just operate the machine , they write a report based on their observations of the image and that's what doctors need to determine treatment.or the technology that actually communicates from one department to another, let alone one surgery/hospital to another within the same authority
Also what was hidden from view was GP's used to be paid from the NHS budget centrally. Labour made a huge thing about giving trusts a huge increase in funds but made them start to pay all the local GP surgeries. I used to know the local trust CEO, she resigned over the change, unfortunately she died soon after. Her family blame the pressure of the changes on her Ill health.It was specifically better before Tony Blair gifted them more money to work fewer hours, but don't let a fact get in the way of the NSC left wing narrative.
To a certain extent, the trouble is that many GPs work part time, so whilst numbers are going up, the hours worked don’t necessarily follow on. At our surgery, which is pretty well run, I think that only one GP can be considered to work full-time, and at the last count, there were about eight doctors working there. Invariably, you get offered an appointment with a nurse or nurse practitioner rather than a GP, which may or may not suffice. I know of quite a few people who have had to, metaphorically, jump up and down and insist on seeing a doctor. As for seeing the same doc, well good luck with that. Not so important if you are going for a fairly straightforward problem, but for those unfortunate enough to have a mental health problem, continuity of care is crucial.that's a factor, i've had night and day difference between city GP and pronvincial town. also the loss of drop in centres, so one less alternative to GP.
fun fact though, GP numbers are going up, quite a lot. why do so many have so many problems getting appointments? personally i think the system is fundementally flawed, as gatekeepers to NHS GP's get bogged down in trivia and referals that could be dealt with in better ways.
Perhaps plays a part, in some cases, but don’t see how as in my OP the turnaround for an appointment, blood test, then consultation about results can go from 4-5 days to 9 weeks, in the space of a few decades. That is well outside of population growth figures as a percentage increase.Another angle I've not seen mentioned yet:
a) population increase = more people seeking GP appointments
b) ageing population = older people [usually] require disproportionately high number of GP appointments
View attachment 170511
View attachment 170513
It was specifically better before Tony Blair gifted them more money to work fewer hours, but don't let a fact get in the way of the NSC left wing narrative.
wonder whyThat actually happened. Confirmed to me by GP’s on a ski trip around that time.
It was a Risdale moment. Blair said we’ll give a significant pay rise to an average of £100k, end weekend work and home visits in the evenings, that’s our one offer.
The GP’s union accepted it in a flash.