The first two books are (in part, they are the many things that constitute English whimsy) a brilliant parody of small-mindedness and its effects.Had to look up what HGTTG stood for!
The first two books are (in part, they are the many things that constitute English whimsy) a brilliant parody of small-mindedness and its effects.Had to look up what HGTTG stood for!
Genuinely interested here ... last I heard, hydrogen generation was still quite a "dirty" and expensive process and one of the reasons why it's lost out to electric when it comes to cars. Has that moved on at all? I believe "green" hydrogen (produced using excess green electricity generation) is still a) very expensive, and b) not common as a result. Blue hydrogen is "ok" (depending on how the carbon produced while making the hydrogen gas is captured and then used), but also not that common. Grey hydrogen still by far the most common, and it's a problem because of the carbon emissions it produces.I am working on a project that also includes enginners based in Scotland who normally work on oil and gas projects. The new project is a Hydrogen generation facility. So they havent lost their jobs and and are the clever ones working towards net zero.
I call Bull Shit to that, how can an effective opposition operate when the Govening party are elected with a ‘landslide’ victory wiping out even the ‘Redwall’ constituencies giving the winning party the ability to pass whatever bills they want backed by a far right wing media blowing smoke up their arseholes leaving the opposition parties effectively silenced, unable to have any input in the legislation process ?Bull S**t.
Two parties are to blame. Poor leadership and poor opposition.
And there can be no argument about that.
Can’t comment on it too much in detail because I'm only a consultant working on some of the technical input, but it’s as green hydrogen facility that is part funded by the UK Government.Genuinely interested here ... last I heard, hydrogen generation was still quite a "dirty" and expensive process and one of the reasons why it's lost out to electric when it comes to cars. Has that moved on at all? I believe "green" hydrogen (produced using excess green electricity generation) is still a) very expensive, and b) not common as a result. Blue hydrogen is "ok" (depending on how the carbon produced while making the hydrogen gas is captured and then used), but also not that common. Grey hydrogen still by far the most common, and it's a problem because of the carbon emissions it produces.
Bull S**t.
Two parties are to blame. Poor leadership and poor opposition.
And there can be no argument about that.
You have sort of answered your own point !I call Bull Shit to that, how can an effective opposition operate when the Govening party are elected with a ‘landslide’ victory wiping out even the ‘Redwall’ constituencies giving the winning party the ability to pass whatever bills they want backed by a far right wing media blowing smoke up their arseholes leaving the opposition parties effectively silenced, unable to have any input in the legislation process ?
Agreed, it doesn’t exonerate the conservative party one bit… but on the same note it doesn’t exonerate labour either. They failed to do the only job an opposition party needs to do, and thats be an effective opposition.Hmmm.... Corbyn-Labour were too poor to win a general election but that doesn't exonerates the bastards who won. Blair beat someone whose name I can no longer remember (and some other bugger after that, and one more time for an encore) but he wasn't a 3 term winner because the opposition were blindingly brilliant.
No, the recent tories have been shit because....they are shit and have blagged their way into a power they had no idea how to exercise. That's all there is to it.
I am happy to criticise Corbyn labour for being a poor opposition. The proof of that poorness is they stayed in opposition. But the people who make the decisions are the government. Any 'holding to account' is relevant only when it comes to the outcome of the subsequent election and the government are held to account by being booted out. (See July 4)Agreed, it doesn’t exonerate the conservative party one bit… but on the same note it doesn’t exonerate labour either. They failed to do the only job an opposition party needs to do, and thats be an effective opposition.
And thats just the facts
A Reform UK candidate claimed the country would be "far better" if it had "taken Hitler up on his offer of neutrality" instead of fighting the Nazis in World War Two.
Ian Gribbin, the party's candidate in Bexhill and Battle, also wrote online that women were the "sponging gender" and should be "deprived of health care".
Reform UK candidate apologises over Hitler neutrality comments
Ian Gribbin says his grandparents were "Russian Jews fleeing persecution" and his comments were taken out of context.www.bbc.co.uk
Where do they find these people?
"The comments were not endorsements but written with an eye to inconvenient perspectives and truths," while his remarks about women were "tongue in cheek".
So just bantz then. Cool. No comment from Mr Gribbon so far. Who makes Lee Anderson look positively woke.
expect this largely because they aren't a proper strucutured party, anyone willing to stump up a deposit can stand under the banner.Seems a nice level headed chap. When Reform HQ were challenged about the comments at Farage Towers, they responded:
You keep arguing that better oppositions can make more of a difference if they become elected as HMG, and if they don't get elected and remain in opposition they are partly to blame for the mistakes made by HMG. That a bit like blaming an unused substitute for a defeat on the grounds that had they been selected the defeat could have been avoided.You have sort of answered your own point !
Had the opposition been better, then the election wouldn’t have resulted in a landslide.
Can’t entirely agree with all that.I am happy to criticise Corbyn labour for being a poor opposition. The proof of that poorness is they stayed in opposition. But the people who make the decisions are the government. Any 'holding to account' is relevant only when it comes to the outcome of the subsequent election and the government are held to account by being booted out. (See July 4)
The policies and decisions that have f***ed so many things up over the last 14 years have been perpetrated by one party, the party of government. I exonerate labour entirely, except for one thing - failing to defeat the Tories in a general election (which is a failing of every party that enters into opposition).
If you want to blame anyone in addition to the Tories for 14 years of misrule, then blame the people who voted for them. I don't accept that call me Dave was elected due to a protest vote against Milliband, or that Johnson was elected due to a protest vote against Corbyn. Cameron was elected because people liked him more than the 'weird' Milliband, and Johnson was elected because people liked him believed him and trusted him over Brexit in particular. And they both f***ed important things up. That's all there is to it.
They've been extraordinarily effective since 2019, opposing a govt with an 80 seat majorityAgreed, it doesn’t exonerate the conservative party one bit… but on the same note it doesn’t exonerate labour either. They failed to do the only job an opposition party needs to do, and thats be an effective opposition.
And thats just the facts
& that he's just saying out loud what many of them are thinking. Including very likely, the leaderexpect this largely because they aren't a proper strucutured party, anyone willing to stump up a deposit can stand under the banner.
Head examined or cynical, spiteful bastardsDepressing - deffo an argument to be made to say anyone voting Reform needs their head examined and anyone voting Tory needs locking up!
If - IF - the LibDems become the opposition, then rejoining the EU is going to be featured a lot at the despatch box in the next parliament. And if they don't, then it is unlikely to. Nevertheless I expect us to be rejoining the single market in some form by the end of the next government or early in the one after.I see the Lib Dems have been the first party in this to actually mention that it might be a good idea to re-enter the European single market and pledging it in their manifesto. I know Starmer is trying to win back the red wall and is trying to avoid this becoming a single-issue election again, but bloody hell, Brexit and our future relationship with the EU really has been an elephant in the room, hasn't it?