severnside gull
Well-known member
Reading the Arsegas I am left a little confused. They quote Hughton as saying that we need full back cover and that the added flexibility of a midfielder (winger) who can presumably convert to full back or a centre back who can stand in when needed is an option he is looking at. All well and good. We have three excellent fullbacks and unless we are unlucky as we were with Bong last season we shouldn't need another specialist. Indeed the idea of a converted winger who can bomb forward leaving a 3 man back line is quite appealing.
However the next paragraph starts to talk about bringing in another centre back as cover.
So does that mean potentially 2 new centre backs (one of whom could cover full back) or one specialist centre back plus a winger who could convert to a defensive role?
Are we going to bring in one player or two?
However the next paragraph starts to talk about bringing in another centre back as cover.
So does that mean potentially 2 new centre backs (one of whom could cover full back) or one specialist centre back plus a winger who could convert to a defensive role?
Are we going to bring in one player or two?