I get that there's disappointment from some but we have to give it a go, be pleased this opportunity exists and get behind the representatives to support them in doing a great job for us all, tell them (politely) if we feel they missed something, and encourage them publicly and loudly when they speak for us. There's no point doing anything else, and like all good ideas I'm sure it'll iterate over time and in a few years it'll look different to how it does now.
Oh, absolutely - it's a great initiative from the club and, at the very least, we absolutely know the two gentlemen of this virtual parish will do a fine job.
The "where are the young people?" isn't even my gripe. As someone who largely avoids twitter I wasn't aware of any fallout on there about this. It was only the posts on this thread that brought it to my attention. Going back to "you don't know what you don't know" I didn't know the demographic profile of those standing (other than the two NSCers) so, by extension, I didn't know the ages of those who were successfully elected. I agree with the broad sentiment though - it does feel a shame that there isn't younger representation, but I'm not sure how that could have happened without the process allowing more expression from the candidates.
But, again, that's not to detract one jot from those who troubled to put themselves forward and now have the chance to be involved in dialogue with the club.