Barrel of Fun
Abort, retry, fail
What was this interference?
Facts From Today
- Thread starter bhadeb
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
What was this interference?
ROSM
Well-known member
cant wait for the answer - she's only posed the same thing about 100 times already. She sees it as a fact rather than an opinion.
Still has a few thousand to go to catch Uncle Spielberg though.
ROSM
Well-known member
The team seem to be doing significantly better recently - oh I assume that is all down to Wilkins whilst any negative is down to the chairman?
Knotty
Well-known member
What simple facts? If they sre so significant, we should know what they are.
You know what they are - please pass them on to us...
m20gull
Well-known member
No help at all
29 Dec - 12th place, 6 points from play-offs
31 Jan - 14th place, 9 points from play-offs
5 Apr - 9th place, 4 points from play-offs
Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
Rosm, no need for the sarcasm , just because I have a different viewpoint this is something that a lot of people on NSC can't seem to get theirr heads around. IT IS A FANS FORUM WHERE PEOPLE ARE FREE TO DISCUSS AND EXPRESS THEIR VIEWS.
Now I know you and other's want some sort of DICTATORSHIP of views and will ALWAYS toe the company line but people are entitled to ask questions. I have said several times I think Wilkins should stay today and just because I do not worship at the alter of Wilkins like you and others doesn't make me less entitled to my opinion as you.
SamSeagull
New member
- Mar 10, 2008
- 104
you cock, better off without fans like you
Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
Point proved, the guy has a different opinion to you nothing more , that does not make him a cock.
Lady_Vale
New member
I'm certainly not going to say we don't deserve to be where we are but everything isn't 'black and white'.
What I will say is that I don't think we have been that much worse than everyone else. We have hit the woodwork more times than any other team in the football league and with the likes of Richards missing the majority of the campaign we haven't had a regular forward partnership, which has cost us dear.
The level of our preformance hasn't been as bad as the league table suggests.
I think every team with have a season like Vale have had this season some time or other.
Don't panic, your not that s***
What I will say is that I don't think we have been that much worse than everyone else. We have hit the woodwork more times than any other team in the football league and with the likes of Richards missing the majority of the campaign we haven't had a regular forward partnership, which has cost us dear.
The level of our preformance hasn't been as bad as the league table suggests.
I think every team with have a season like Vale have had this season some time or other.
Don't panic, your not that s***
The Large One
Who's Next?
That's not the point he was making.
Bhadeb has said several times (especially around Christmas time) that she knows EXACTLY what's going on at the club, and that everything negative at the club is down to Dick Knight, and that he is interfering with Dean Wilkins' job. All that has been asked of her (many, many times by several people) is for her to back this statement up with how she knows all this.
In other words, is she a BHA employee? Is she a player's wife? Is she an ex-squeeze of DK? Or is she just making it up?
All she has said is 'I know about this, and you don't' when all we're asking for is some clarification...
Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
fair enough
London Pompous
Active member
- Feb 16, 2008
- 660
Agreed, his differing opinion does not make him a cock, his incessant spiteful and petty vendettas against certain players and management, except of course his beloved FDM, do make him one.
ROSM
Well-known member
Good one US, I almost fell for this.
Oh....you were being serious!
Best defend myself then:
You are a prize bufoon. I dont want a dictatorship of views. I want to have a debate. If others hold a different opinion to me then fine. But please accept I may want to debate that. You see I agree we need to air and DISCUSS our views. Would you prefer people stating a view (and claiming it as fact) and then never posting on that thread again? If that were the case you would have a tenth of the post count you have now!
By all means ask questions - but be prepared for answers and respect them when given.
As for ALWAYS toeing the company line. That shows you have once again made a statement made on opinion rather than fact but try to present it as truth. When the club make mistakes (as they do from time to time), I will criticise as anybody else. If I think they are being criticised unfairly, I will air my view.
Finally;worship at the altar of wilkins? You really do know nothing of my views. Just for clarity:
1) I wouldn't have given him the job
2) I think he is doing adequately at present but does let himself down at times
Uncle Spielberg
Well-known member
I am sorry Rosm, I got the wrong end of the stick, you were just calling me an opinionated bastard 
ROSM
Well-known member
I am sorry Rosm, I got the wrong end of the stick, you were just calling me an opinionated bastard
exactly - and I resemble that remark too
BensGrandad
New member
You have hit the nail on the head.
The diamond leaves us too open in the centre of midfield and allows the opposition too much space to play which was shown yesterday by the 3 efforts that hit the bar and the 1 goal from their central midfielder. Mistake by the mangement team that they couldnt rectify for some unknown reason.
The Large One
Who's Next?
They changed to the diamond after their first goal.
Thomson and Racon, however, were pretty shite, so ANY formation wouldn't have worked.
I recall Wendy screaming an awful lot at Westlake as well.
Thomson and Racon, however, were pretty shite, so ANY formation wouldn't have worked.
I recall Wendy screaming an awful lot at Westlake as well.