Anyway, nice chatting. I'm off to bed.
I have a number of views which might at first seem at odds with the classical idea of a lefty. One has to in the 21st century.
They are required to by law .... who's law ? ..... you've got it, the EU's law ! Yes the EU wants tax from illegal activities !!!! Let's not mention that their auditors have refused to sign off their accounts for well over a decade. A criminal organisation demanding tax on criminal activities and STILL there are idiots and simpletons who think we should stay in.
You rightly criticise those who classify UKIP supporters as Little Englanders, yet you classify those who are in favour of the EU as idiots and simpletons.
Out of curiosity, do you think I'm an idiot, a simpleton, or both?
Humour me - list them. I'll be honest - I don't believe you.
I don't have an issue with big-business, wealth, private schools, the US and/or privilege per se. These are items which others have wrongly presumed based on my politics and a couple quite recently on this site. I would like to clarify I'm not particularly Pro any of these either; more that as long as small-business, less-wealthy, state schools and unprivileged are not impeded I don't care. I can draw an analogy with music, I don't care for X-Factor or One Direction but their presence doesn't affect the music I like and enjoy so I'm not overly bothered by them. If they did start affecting me then it would be different.
I have said before my main reason for my politics is because I believe in fairness and opportunity and whilst far from perfect I feel The Labour Party offer the best deal.
Your pro EU disposition naturally means that you are willing to sacrifice British interests for the greater good of all the peoples of the EU.
To be fair I think the vast majority of people possess exactly the same belief on opportunity and fairness for all regardless where they sit on the political spectrum
So you are also calling Pat McFadden the Labour Europe Shadow Minister clueless? And you, the arch-Labour luvvie, are also calling Ed Balls clueless in this respect. Mark Rutte, the Dutch Prime Minister is also clueless? And the Italian Prime Minister who described it as a 'lethal weapon' - also clueless? And the Greek Prime Minister whose country has been right royally stiffed by Germany and the EU already and are on their knees. Also clueless.
All of them, whose day jobs are to know about these things weren't aware. But they're all clueless. 4 prime ministers, a Europe shadow minister and a shadow chancellor. Certainly the Germans weren't expecting it - one paper describes it as an early Christmas present. Are the Germans clueless too?
Clearly, the EU has sprung this. Trouble is, it's so palpably ridiculous behaviour by the EU that even you find it difficult defending the actions so all you've got is the usual anti-Cameron stuff, well-rehearsed for occasions like this. You carry on cracking jokes about Little Englanders and clueless prime ministers - there's a referendum coming soon and the ineptitude and continual high-minded inability to understand national sensitivities shown by the EU and their acolytes will surely come back to haunt them.
...And not just in Britain. How do the EU expect Greece to pay? Seriously, HT, how do they pay? Borrow more money from the EU at higher rates? Is that fair? All it will do is add thousands of votes to the likes of Golden Dawn and probably accelerate Greece's exit from the EU too. I'm amazed that you can't see just how dangerous this game that the EU are playing is to stability and democracy within Europe.
You rightly criticise those who classify UKIP supporters as Little Englanders, yet you classify those who are in favour of the EU as idiots and simpletons.
Out of curiosity, do you think I'm an idiot, a simpleton, or both?
It has emerged in today's press that Treasury ministers have been aware of the exact amount for months.
Not in the report I've just read. It says it was known a recalculation was taking place but the demand and the amount were only this week.
Let's take for example that we could fund 20 ( yes TWENTY ) new hospitals in our major cities a year from the net contribution we give the EU every year.
Lots of love, a little Englander !
It has emerged in today's press that Treasury ministers have been aware of the exact amount for months.
I've argued this point before. The contributions to the EU are a fraction of the amount the UK recieves back from the Eurozone.
If we as the uk don't want to pay the contribution, then give the slippery Farage his wish with an in out, and if it was an out vote, then no longer pay the contributions, but also we stop getting as many billions from the Eurozone too.
Treasury ministerS?
Do you mean Treasury officials? Unelected public servants. There's only one Treasury minister in the UK and the Guardian reports that Treasury ministers across the EU found out only a day or two before Cameron.
Back to my question please - do you think it fair that Greee should have to pay quarter of a billion pounds it clearly doesn't have to a body that can't even get its own accounts signed off knowing full well that it's going to push that country inexorably closer to voting in a far-right Government?
Or does fairness, the long picture and political and national stability only really matter when the EU is thinking of German interests?
We are a net contributor to the EU so don't get 'billions from the Eurozone'. Unless of course you're referring to trade. Nobody has yet provided any evidence or even a convincing argument that EU members would cease to trade with us just because we leave a club.
Yes but they still could fund those hospitals, they choose not to. This Hospitals fund scenarios always get said when ever the government spend money on unpopular things, war, hs2 etc.
"Yeah but with that money we could build 5 more hospitals..etc".
Fact is the treasurey and I'd say Lab/Con/Lib knew about the payment increase a while ago but there was a by election and they didn't want ukip to have more ammo. But why didn't ukip know? They have a huge number of meps, Farage being one. The formula for adjusting set contributions are out there why didn't ukip work it out? Because they are a bunch of thick idiots is my guess.
I've argued this point before. The contributions to the EU are a fraction of the amount the UK recieves back from the Eurozone.
If we as the uk don't want to pay the contribution, then give the slippery Farage his wish with an in out, and if it was an out vote, then no longer pay the contributions, but also we stop getting as many billions from the Eurozone too.