LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Yes.
If they want to shoot red lights knowing that several tonnes of metal could be coming from a different direction at speed then let natural selection do it's thing.
Yes.
If they want to shoot red lights knowing that several tonnes of metal could be coming from a different direction at speed then let natural selection do it's thing.
They have black people and women to harass, there’s only so many hours in the day.Interesting…..a quick and brief google search led me to believe that the Met were one of the only forces to ‘crackdown’ on illegal use
Probably too busy with more important things
And cows to corralThey have black people and women to harass, there’s only so many hours in the day.
Geez! What a misguided reply.I cycle to work, most days, the arrogance and entitlement as well as the agressive and 'f*** you' attitude of some drivers is staggering. The same can be said for some cyclists. I get the impression many cyclists haven't heard of the highway code, let alone read it, or passed a cycling proficiency test.
What @Gabbafella was implying is, if an uninsured cyclists breaks the law by jumping lights, gets hit by his car, he'll be at a loss, that's hardly fair. I worked with a guy who lost his no claims bonus because he was hit by a cyclist. Hardly life changing, but a glitch.
If you're on the road with that kind of attitude I really don't care if you get squashed. It's not like we're short of population!
And cows to corral
Tut no way to talk about the womenAnd cows to corral
And the difference from E-bikes is…………No need to pass a test that ensures the user knows the highway code and no license to ensure they abide by it?
no insurance for when they inevitably damage someone's car?
Probably no enforceable need for safety wear.
It has roadside death written all over it.
To be fair, if the cyclist jumped a red light then their safety is their concern, not anyone else’s.So you nearly hit someone and your chief concern is the damage to your car?
I think you meant "ram" rather than "corral".And cows to corral
The trouble is people with influence over these things continue to believe shared walkways are okay but all it does is move cyclist/ motorist conflict to that of cyclist/ pedestrian. The only real solution is segregated cycleways. Cycling organisations, when consulted are repeatedly thwarted in favour of half-baked uninformed solutions. Far too much emphasis is given to them demands of the motor vehicle when getting people out of cars is the best solution.pavements are for pedestrians
if you want to use propulsion, of ANY kind, get on the road, and you must have some form of proficiency test to be there and have 3rd party insurance.
Yes, anybody who seriously thinks painting a white bicycle on the pavement is a solution and not a problem should be made to give their head a shake. Compulsory move to another job where they can't do any more harm would be desirable.The trouble is people with influence over these things continue to believe shared walkways are okay but all it does is move cyclist/ motorist conflict to that of cyclist/ pedestrian. The only real solution is segregated cycleways. Cycling organisations, when consulted are repeatedly thwarted in favour of half-baked uninformed solutions. Far too much emphasis is given to them demands of the motor vehicle when getting people out of cars is the best solution.