[Football] Dyer substitution

[T.G]

Anyone know why he was hauled off after 35mins for Ayew? He look angry when he got to the dug our. Not sure if that was tactical or injury. I deffo would have limped off just to avoid embarrassment!

 

[LamieRobertson]

Anyone know why he was hauled off after 35mins for Ayew? He look angry when he got to the dug our. Not sure if that was tactical or injury. I deffo would have limped off just to avoid embarrassment!

Carlos wanted to put more meat on the bbq but he didn’t manage to keep their heads above the water

 

[RM-Taylor]

Change of formation and tactics. Fair play to Carvahal for realising a change was needed and doing it in the first half.

 

[albionfan37]

Tactical they wanted more ball in the attacking third

 

[Kalimantan Gull]

Commentator reckoned tactical. Certainly their 5-4-1 wasn't working and they got better with Ayew on. Then Carvahal went over the top aggressive. Fine when chasing a game at home, suicidal away. They could have a got a point yesterday but their second half formation didn't really give them a chance

 

[Hampster Gull]

He was a chicken kebab stick and Carlos wanted a sausage

 

[Seagull58]

Carlos wanted to put more meat on the bbq but he didn’t manage to keep their heads above the water

They got their meat sliced off and chucked on the bbq as their heads sank beneath the waves.

 

[Weststander]

If you put a Formula 1 car in Brighton in traffic, the Formula 1 car will not run very fast.

 

[Pantani]

Change of formation and tactics. Fair play to Carvahal for realising a change was needed and doing it in the first half.

Not sure about that, realising they needed to change their tactic was good. However, totally ceding the midfield to us was what killed Swansea. So for me Carvalhal spotted the problem but failed to correct it and actually made it far worse.

 

[Arkwright]

I thought that Bong had marked Dyer out of the game. Credit to Bong for another fantastic performance.

 

[Invicta]

He'd been Bonged !

 

[GT49er]

Fair play to Carvahal in my book. They were losing, didn't look like troubling us - losing 1-0 is still nil points, so he gambled, as he himself said in his post match interview. OK, it didn't work, but credit to him for trying. Keeping it tight and losing 1-0 might have looked better in the record books, but it wouldn't have done them any good.

 

[dwayne]

Fair play to Carvahal in my book. They were losing, didn't look like troubling us - losing 1-0 is still nil points, so he gambled, as he himself said in his post match interview. OK, it didn't work, but credit to him for trying. Keeping it tight and losing 1-0 might have looked better in the record books, but it wouldn't have done them any good.

He went all out attack and they got punished heavily without us playing that well. Manager screwed up big time.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

 

[GT49er]

He went all out attack and they got punished heavily without us playing that well. Manager screwed up big time.

Justifiable gamble, didn't come off. His record with Swansea suggests he knows what he's doing. And we didn't play that well.........? Really? Funny nobody else noticed that........

 

[stss30]

He went all out attack and they got punished heavily without us playing that well. Manager screwed up big time.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Completely agree actually. We were very poor first half but them going hung go gave us the perfect opportunity to counter attack, which we are good at.

 

[Mackenzie]

I thought their manager’s decisions were the reason Swansea got a shoeing yesterday. It was evident from the first goal kick that we’d prepared for their 541 and had plans to exploit it. The Dyer substitution was correct as that set up wasn’t working and Swansea improved for it. Then he seemed to panic and put on ALL the forwards and we ran riot.

Carvalhal converted a possible draw into a damaging loss.