[Football] Duffy

[Whoislloydy]

If we are playing four at the back, then the CB partnership needs to be Dunk'n'Duffy.

Webster excels in a back three or five, with that added CB for cover.

 

[Lindfield by the Pond]

In a 3CB formation, he works really well as Dunk and Webster like a forage forward, and oppo don't know what to do with a CB running at them. Leaves two CB's at the back. Not so good in a 4 at back though

 

[Wardy's twin]

I am not saying Duffy is mistake free, some have Bern terrible e.g. Huddersfield at home with cramp ba k pass. What I am saying is that he adds a physical presence that none of the other defenders (including Dunk) do. Some games e.g. Burnley you need strong CBs to challenge their robust play. Also playing out from the back doesn't work when opposition are good for a high press. CH was criticised because he didn't have a plan B , potter has a different plan a but again not sure he has a real plan b , I.e. he brings on similar players to tinker with plan a rather than change game style. Personally prefer to have different style players around. I would like to see Ben White back, he has done well at Leeds so time to take next step up.

 

[*Gullsworth*]

Duffy not going anywhere. Arsenal sniffing around a centre back of ours and it's not Dunk, nor Duffy.

 

[Insel affe]

Duffy not going anywhere. Arsenal sniffing around a centre back of ours and it's not Dunk, nor Duffy.

Oh Leeds will be upset then

 

[*Gullsworth*]

Oh Leeds will be upset then

No not him. Believe it or not one of our regulars not someone on loan. Some on here would drive him there.





That's all I am saying

 

[vagabond]

No not him. Believe it or not one of our regulars not someone on loan. Some on here would drive him there.





That's all I am saying

Possibly Dan Burn then, and that would explain the new contract he’s got.

 

[sparkie]

No not him. Believe it or not one of our regulars not someone on loan. Some on here would drive him there.





That's all I am saying

I saw a while back that they may be interested in Webster.

The pitchfork mob could chase him up there.

I hope the rumour is nonsense.

 

[Insel affe]

I saw a while back that they may be interested in Webster.

The pitchfork mob could chase him up there.

I hope the rumour is nonsense.

Sad if true, I still can not fathom why people dislike him.

As you say the pitchfork mob sums them up, probably the same lot that still throw stones at the moon.

 

[Megazone]

No not him. Believe it or not one of our regulars not someone on loan. Some on here would drive him there.





That's all I am saying

Will never happen according to the experts. Not only is he nowhere near good enough for us, apparently Potter is too stubborn and full of pride to stop playing him. He'll never let him go.

 

[BensGrandad]

If we can get back the money we paid for Webster I would take it and look to bring back Clark and or White to take his place.

 

[schmunk]

I saw a while back that they may be interested in Webster.

The pitchfork mob could chase him up there.

I hope the rumour is nonsense.

I don't dislike him and think he's actually doing a good job, but for £50M and half a pack of Toffos, he's theirs.

 

[Dave the OAP]

I saw a while back that they may be interested in Webster.

The pitchfork mob could chase him up there.

I hope the rumour is nonsense.

 

[BLOCK F]

There is an article online by Total Football Analysis about Adam Webster being of possible interest to Arsenal.
Google 'Total Football Analysis Adam Webster' and there is loads of it........a scout's perspective on his suitability to play in Arteta's team.
Makes interesting reading and would make some of the Webster haters choke on their proverbial cornflakes!

 

[jonny.rainbow]

I saw a while back that they may be interested in Webster.

The pitchfork mob could chase him up there.

I hope the rumour is nonsense.

He’s a good fit for Arsenal.

Confident, ball-playing centre-half prone to defensive lapses every game.

 

[Tony Meolas Loan Spell]

Sad if true, I still can not fathom why people dislike him.

As you say the pitchfork mob sums them up, probably the same lot that still throw stones at the moon.

Always out of position. Cant head the ball (defensively), cant tackle and generally a weak physical presence.

Plus as Merry Prankster said on the radio his attitude after Bmths 3rd stank.

But because of one run out of defence people think he is Der Kaiser.

 

[Tony Meolas Loan Spell]

There is an article online by Total Football Analysis about Adam Webster being of possible interest to Arsenal.
Google 'Total Football Analysis Adam Webster' and there is loads of it........a scout's perspective .on his suitability to play in Arteta's team.
Makes interesting reading and would make some of the Webster haters choke on their proverbial cornflakes!

I will drive him there myself.

 

[BLOCK F]

I will drive him there myself.

Tony, judging by your history of quotes, that doesn't come as a complete surprise.
I dare say you would tie his hands behind his back, blindfold him and bundle him into the boot just in case he harboured any thoughts of escaping your demonic clutches!

 

[SIMMO SAYS]

He’s a good fit for Arsenal.

Confident, ball-playing centre-half prone to defensive lapses every five minutes .

Altered a little bit lol

 

[peterward]

Duffy not going anywhere. Arsenal sniffing around a centre back of ours and it's not Dunk, nor Duffy.

No not him. Believe it or not one of our regulars not someone on loan. Some on here would drive him there.

That's all I am saying

For sure not Duffy?

https://www.90min.com/posts/6544765-arsenal-absolutely-have-to-sign-brighton-s-shane-duffy-this-january-yes-seriously