Dream Shag or Falmer ??

[Gritt23]

If you had the choice of a night of lust with your dream woman (Rachel Stevens, Natalie Imbruglia or whoever) OR Falmer to be approved, which would you go for.

 

[BrightonBird]

Falmer as I don't fancy sleeping with either of those.

And you don't know what your missing either so Falmer again

 

[Gritt23]

I'll knock back Rachel for Falmer to be approved.

 

[CHAPPERS]

Falmer.

 

[Hiney]

Falmer

 

[tinx]

Falmer without a doubt.......Dream shag is one night Falmer is forever.

 

[Bozza]

Those who have voted "sod the stadium" have got me thinking - see new poll I am about to create....

 

[Biscuit]

erm.....



D***M S**G F*R M*

 

[Gritt23]

erm.....



D***M S**G F*R M*

.. and who would it be Biscuit?
Getting who into bed is more important to you than Falmer.

 

[Eggman]

Being inside Falmer for the first Brighton game there would be like making love to my top 5 dream birds!

So


FALMER!!!

 

[Artois]

This is the most difficult decision I have ever ever ever faced.

 

[Biscuit]

.. and who would it be Biscuit?
Getting who into bed is more important to you than Falmer.

I was try to be controversial. But since you asked Rachel Stevens.

 

[Trigger]

Sod the stadium, i need to empty my sack...

 

[Seagullible]

voted dream shag but only after reading the oher poll about results. Falmer IS vital, dream shag has happened many times in my dreams!

 

[Yorkie]

Easy for me as I'm not into women so Falmer of course

 

[Gritt23]

I was try to be controversial. But since you asked Rachel Stevens.

Oh okay, can't argue with that, it was a close call myself.

 

[Marshy]

I shag my dream shag most nights of the week anyway.

All you need is an imagination !

 

[tedebear]

I don't shag I make love- so it would have to be Falmer

 

[Gritt23]

Easy for me as I'm not into women so Falmer of course

Doesn't have to be women, whoever you fancy. Oh hang on, reading your post again, are you choosing "Easy10" ?

 

[Zeitgeist]

Sod the stadium, i need to empty my sack...

That statement could be taken in a different context!?...