Don Quixote
Well-known member
- Nov 4, 2008
- 8,362
Its funny all the bad signings are Dick Knights fault while all the good signings must be Dean Wilkins. Weird that. I always thought the managers were responsible for bringing in the team.
Its funny all the bad signings are Dick Knights fault while all the good signings must be Dean Wilkins. Weird that. I always thought the managers were responsible for bringing in the team.
You would like to think that but it dosen't always happen
So Mcfaul and Dixon were obviously Knight while the genius signings of the likes of Murray were Wilkins'? Sounds a bit fishy to me...
So Mcfaul and Dixon were obviously Knight while the genius signings of the likes of Murray were Wilkins'? Sounds a bit fishy to me...
Its funny all the bad signings are Dick Knights fault while all the good signings must be Dean Wilkins. Weird that. I always thought the managers were responsible for bringing in the team.
Sorry, but you cannot absolve yourself of those kind of responsibilities, and ultimately, that will cost you your job if you chose to support the workers and not support your boss.
So Mcfaul and Dixon were obviously Knight while the genius signings of the likes of Murray were Wilkins'? Sounds a bit fishy to me...
As I have said many times before, during all the problems of Bas Savage, George O'Callaghan, Dean Hammond etc etc, where did Dean Wilkins EVER come out in the press and support either the Chairman or the clubs position on wages and contract negotiations?? The whole situation was left to the chairman to fight in the press, sometimes against support opinion - AGAIN - having been left high and dry by the manager because he simply wasn't interested about getting involved in those types of discussions. And that's not because 'I know' - that's just what happened. Sorry, but you cannot absolve yourself of those kind of responsibilities, and ultimately, that will cost you your job if you chose to support the workers and not support your boss.
They are responsible. The bile that is being spewed up on this thread is to serve one agenda and one only - to justify their own views on Dick Knight. They have absolutely no basis of truth whatsoever because the truth is that nobody of any integrity actually knows - not bhadeb and her f***ing ridiculous crusade, not Mr Burns, not anybody.
The players will get identified - DK and the manager will meet the player, DK will do the negotiations - that's exactly what happens at every club.
I am sorry Garry but you have me confused here, are you saying that you do know someone with the integrity that confirms these people are wrong.
Is this person of integrity informing you that player recruitment is carried out this way at the club?
Because unless you name that person, why should people believe you rather than bhdeb or Mr Burns or in fact any fan who has serious doubts on how this happens at the Albion.
I think the question here is do they get identified by the manager as a player he wants or DK and Barry Lloyd as who they think he should have?
I think it's been proved that Knight and Lloyd signed players that Wilkins hadn't even heard of let alone wanted
Sorry, but you cannot absolve yourself of those kind of responsibilities, and ultimately, that will cost you your job if you chose to support the workers and not support your boss.
I am sorry Garry but you have me confused here, are you saying that you do know someone with the integrity that confirms these people are wrong.
I am not saying your wrong Ernest, but where has it been proved?
No Tony I'm not, I'm saying that what they are sprouting is the bile to serve their own agenda - not NECESSARILY something the reflects the truth.