Kalimantan Gull
Well-known member
On weak penalty claims a referee can have a quick think about it and go 'nah'. When he's looking at loads of slo-mo replays, its a lot harder to run back onto the pitch and go 'nah'
Absolute nonsense (IMO).
All shots would be easily savable, if they actually travelled in slow motion.
Absolute nonsense (IMO).
All shots would be easily savable, if they actually travelled in slow motion.
Have it down nearer his side?Ridiculous decision! He was contesting a header, WTF is he supposed to do with his arm
I'm not arguing about this one, as I'm not sure whether it's a fair decision or not, but in general, having your hands out or up etc is enough.Never a penalty, it has to be deliberate handball! Baffling decision.
Have it down nearer his side?
Without VAR Iran would have got an equaliser last night, maybe grabbed a point and left Spain sweating on the line.
It seems to me that VAR is making refs / linesmen slightly more lax, in much the same way that cricket umpires refer EVERY run-out even when the decision is patently obvious.
True, but the commentator missed that when the goal so total shambles. I look forward to the time when the refs are miked up to the PA and explain to crowd why the goal has been disallowed - in 6 different languages.With the Iran 'goal', the linesman actually already had his flag up before it even went to the review, so the goal would not have counted anyway. What he was checking was if he could allow it, but the lino had been spot on anyway.
Penalty for me, bit harsh on the yellow card though.
Penalty for me, bit harsh on the yellow card though.