Curtains for the BBC...

[Pretty pink fairy]

https://youtu.be/-W3YMyuTMmQ

Regards
DF

 

[Pretty pink fairy]

https://youtu.be/-W3YMyuTMmQ
Labour out of touch as usual.
Regards
DF

 

[cunning fergus]

You took your time getting here Clampy?

The proposal stands, if people like bhadebenhams want to assert libellous views about me on here then no point putting them to the test with a derisory value. If it matters enough for some to want to reference what they think they know about me on here then let it really matter. Unsurprisingly he has since melted away.

But now your here and as one of this forum’s principle befuddled narcissists, (your signature says it all doesn’t it), do you a) want to underwrite bhadebenhams assertions for a donation to charity, or b) as Bozza says, play nicely, whilst it’s flattering to be of such interest to you lot, this obsession with what I wear, where I live and what I do etc. really isn’t healthy.

Chin chin.

I have absolutely no interest in your private life or your personal details and if my memory serve me correctly I have never enquired or guessed. The 5k figure made me chuckle as it’s like something a school kid would say “ “I bet you a million pounds”
There’s really no need to get so worked up over my comment. So please calm down Scrappy Doo.

If I may offer a tip though? If you are going to accuse people of being libellous it’s probably in your interest to ;

A) get the correct poster.

B) not go around accusing people of being a narcissist. It is not your place to diagnose personality disorders on a forum. I am not keen on the trend of calling anyone who does something you don’t like a narcissist. A few years ago it was psychopath, now it’s narcissist. It’s not okay and I’d politely ask you not to throw accusations of mental health problems around on an Internet forum. I have done it before and trust me, it’s not a good look.

The signature? It’s a Modern Toss quote. Brighton cartoonist.

Cheers
TC[/QUOTE]



Oh dear, who would have thought Clampy the self styled “stench of excellence” is not a narcissist but actually a thin skinned sensitive type. How adorable.

And a bit hatstand on numbers too I note, a manageable 5k to sponsor bhadebenhams posting about me is a light year from a mill. A shame for the charity of his choice too if he’s confident enough to put them on here but not to put his money where his mouth is.

Not that ANYONE’S personal shit should being put up here for all and sundry to view simply because some befuddled narcissists don’t like other people’s opinions.

Cowards eh, like their multitude of bullshit posts on a football fan forum they are always content to die a thousand deaths.

 

[The Clamp]

[MENTION=12825]cunning fergus[/MENTION]

I genuinely have no idea what on earth you are going on about. That’s not an insult or a dig, I simply cannot understand what it is you’re accusing me of.

I’ve never really noticed you before so I don’t know if this is your regular posting style or you’re having a bit of a tizzy. Whatever it is, be a darling and leave me out of it please.

 

[bhadebenhams]

£5k not much for you no doubt, but a lot for those trying to make ends meet under the ever increasing costs created by your Tory chums.

 

[Randy McNob]

https://youtu.be/-W3YMyuTMmQ
Labour out of touch as usual.
Regards
DF

Yes, Nadine Dorries really does stand up for the poorest in society....

Consistently voted against raising welfare benefits at least in line with prices
0 votes for, 5 votes against, in 2013. Comparable Conservative MPs consistently voted against (6 votes, in 2013).

Generally voted for making local councils responsible for helping those in financial need afford their council tax and reducing the amount spent on such support
2 votes for, 0 votes against, 2 absences, in 2012. Comparable Conservative MPs almost always voted for (8 votes, in 2012).

Almost always voted against paying higher benefits over longer periods for those unable to work due to illness or disability
0 votes for, 13 votes against, 2 absences, between 2011–2016. Comparable Conservative MPs consistently voted against (18 votes, between 2011–2016).

Generally voted for reducing housing benefit for social tenants deemed to have excess bedrooms (which Labour describe as the "bedroom tax")
8 votes for, 0 votes against, 10 absences, between 2011–2018. Comparable Conservative MPs almost always voted for (18 votes, between 2011–2018).

Generally voted for a reduction in spending on welfare benefits
38 votes for, 0 votes against, 16 absences, between 2012–2016. Comparable Conservative MPs almost always voted for (63 votes, between 2010–2016).

Consistently voted against spending public money to create guaranteed jobs for young people who have spent a long time unemployed
0 votes for, 9 votes against, between 2011–2014. Comparable Conservative MPs almost always voted against (10 votes, between 2011–2014).

Generally voted for increasing the rate of VAT
17 votes for, 3 votes against, 7 absences, between 2010–2019. Comparable Conservative MPs generally voted for (34 votes, between 2008–2019).

Generally voted for higher taxes on plane tickets
7 votes for, 0 votes against, 4 absences, between 2013–2017. Comparable Conservative MPs almost always voted for (17 votes, between 2012–2017).

Generally voted for higher taxes on alcoholic drinks
11 votes for, 3 votes against, 8 absences, between 2010–2017. Comparable Conservative MPs generally voted for (26 votes, between 2010–2017).

https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/11397/nadine_dorries/mid_bedfordshire/votes

 

[The Clamp]

She’s bonkers.

 

[cunning fergus]

£5k not much for you no doubt, but a lot for those trying to make ends meet under the ever increasing costs created by your Tory chums.

Well now, here’s a change in tone, not so bold……a bit high pitched like your balls have shrunk.

If your posts about me are accurate, then it’s not going to cost you a penny is it, because I will be the one donating 5k to charity. As I have said, I will share my details with a mod to confirm my name and who I work for then we proceed directly to the charity donation stage……if you can’t afford 5k in one sitting then pay it in instalments.

Alternatively you can simply apologise to me for trying to call me out by using a first name that’s incorrect and tying me to a firm I have never worked for all because you don’t like what I post……that’s the honourable (albeit cowardly) way out given you assertions…..so, how big are your balls?

 

[bhadebenhams]

Well now, here’s a change in tone, not so bold……a bit high pitched like your balls have shrunk.

If your posts about me are accurate, then it’s not going to cost you a penny is it, because I will be the one donating 5k to charity. As I have said, I will share my details with a mod to confirm my name and who I work for then we proceed directly to the charity donation stage……if you can’t afford 5k in one sitting then pay it in instalments.

Alternatively you can simply apologise to me for trying to call me out by using a first name that’s incorrect and tying me to a firm I have never worked for all because you don’t like what I post……that’s the honourable (albeit cowardly) way out given you assertions…..so, how big are your balls?

Apologise to someone who is regularly banned from NSC by the mods for unpleasant, bullying, bigoted behaviour? Nah, don't think so, have you ever apologised for the comments that have had you banned?

 

[Chicken Run]

(we can ask a mod to act impartially)……..

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Lever]

I have absolutely no interest in your private life or your personal details and if my memory serve me correctly I have never enquired or guessed. The 5k figure made me chuckle as it’s like something a school kid would say “ “I bet you a million pounds”
There’s really no need to get so worked up over my comment. So please calm down Scrappy Doo.

If I may offer a tip though? If you are going to accuse people of being libellous it’s probably in your interest to ;

A) get the correct poster.

B) not go around accusing people of being a narcissist. It is not your place to diagnose personality disorders on a forum. I am not keen on the trend of calling anyone who does something you don’t like a narcissist. A few years ago it was psychopath, now it’s narcissist. It’s not okay and I’d politely ask you not to throw accusations of mental health problems around on an Internet forum. I have done it before and trust me, it’s not a good look.

The signature? It’s a Modern Toss quote. Brighton cartoonist.

Cheers
TC

Oh dear, who would have thought Clampy the self styled “stench of excellence” is not a narcissist but actually a thin skinned sensitive type. How adorable.

And a bit hatstand on numbers too I note, a manageable 5k to sponsor bhadebenhams posting about me is a light year from a mill. A shame for the charity of his choice too if he’s confident enough to put them on here but not to put his money where his mouth is.

Not that ANYONE’S personal shit should being put up here for all and sundry to view simply because some befuddled narcissists don’t like other people’s opinions.

Cowards eh, like their multitude of bullshit posts on a football fan forum they are always content to die a thousand deaths.[/QUOTE]





Well I don't mind you having a different opinion; in fact it opens up the possibility of constructive debate and helps open minded people to 'fine tune' their thoughts on contentious matters.

Your visceral responses with unnecessarily insulting language are more of a problem.

I strongly support you for expressing your opinions as long as you have some decent evidence to back them up. As mentioned before, it's the rather daft similes/metaphors and lack of respect for other people's views that you need to end in my opinion.

 

[Lever]

She’s bonkers.

 

[WATFORD zero]

Apologise to someone who is regularly banned from NSC by the mods for unpleasant, bullying, bigoted behaviour? Nah, don't think so, have you ever apologised for the comments that have had you banned?

Doesn't seem to matter what he posts or how many times he gets banned or the repeated reasons, he just keeps re-appearing.

I really can't imagine why, it's not like he's a special case, is it

 

[cunning fergus]

Apologise to someone who is regularly banned from NSC by the mods for unpleasant, bullying, bigoted behaviour? Nah, don't think so, have you ever apologised for the comments that have had you banned?

Well, I offered you a way out,….….so when are we going to put your recent postings about me to the test?

Show us you’ve got the balls to stand behind what you post and you’re not another gutless narcissist furiously bashing away on a laptop in your Mum’s box room. Straight offer of either a lump sum or instalments to the tune of 5k to charity. It can be the REMF if you like?

I’m considering this one, when I demonstrate you really know f*ck all about me obviously.

https://give.careaftercombat.org/auction/4/charity.owntermslink

In your own time.

 

[cunning fergus]

Oh dear, who would have thought Clampy the self styled “stench of excellence” is not a narcissist but actually a thin skinned sensitive type. How adorable.

And a bit hatstand on numbers too I note, a manageable 5k to sponsor bhadebenhams posting about me is a light year from a mill. A shame for the charity of his choice too if he’s confident enough to put them on here but not to put his money where his mouth is.

Not that ANYONE’S personal shit should being put up here for all and sundry to view simply because some befuddled narcissists don’t like other people’s opinions.

Cowards eh, like their multitude of bullshit posts on a football fan forum they are always content to die a thousand deaths.

Well I don't mind you having a different opinion; in fact it opens up the possibility of constructive debate and helps open minded people to 'fine tune' their thoughts on contentious matters.

Your visceral responses with unnecessarily insulting language are more of a problem.

I strongly support you for expressing your opinions as long as you have some decent evidence to back them up. As mentioned before, it's the rather daft similes/metaphors and lack of respect for other people's views that you need to end in my opinion.[/QUOTE]



Let’s put it this way…….

Dear Pot

Yours sincerely


Kettle.

PS. I’m not a bleater, if someone wants to be insulting to me, then expect it back I won’t run off to the mods…….this is the quid pro quo is it not? Don’t like what I say ignore me, it’s not like I am on here every day.

This is not my board either and I am always respectful of that, I don’t make the rules. If I get a ban for quoting Krept and Konan lyrics, I will take the ban, no complaints and move on. The trouble is some people can’t move on can they?

 

[Lever]

Well I don't mind you having a different opinion; in fact it opens up the possibility of constructive debate and helps open minded people to 'fine tune' their thoughts on contentious matters.

Your visceral responses with unnecessarily insulting language are more of a problem.

I strongly support you for expressing your opinions as long as you have some decent evidence to back them up. As mentioned before, it's the rather daft similes/metaphors and lack of respect for other people's views that you need to end in my opinion.

Let’s put it this way…….

Dear Pot

Yours sincerely


Kettle.

PS. I’m not a bleater, if someone wants to be insulting to me, then expect it back I won’t run off to the mods…….this is the quid pro quo is it not? Don’t like what I say ignore me, it’s not like I am on here every day.

This is not my board either and I am always respectful of that, I don’t make the rules. If I get a ban for quoting Krept and Konan lyrics, I will take the ban, no complaints and move on. The trouble is some people can’t move on can they?[/QUOTE]




The difference between us is that I differentiate between you as a person and the comments you make. I respect the difference between us and your right to make your views public. But I have no respect at all for the unnecessarily potty language you rely on in making your comments or the quality of your arguments. Have another go......

Why do you say you can't move on from things then?

 

[Pretty pink fairy]

Meanwhile back on topic here's a valid article

https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/01/19/why-should-we-pay-for-a-bbc-that-hates-us/


Regards
DF

 

[The Clamp]

Well I don't mind you having a different opinion; in fact it opens up the possibility of constructive debate and helps open minded people to 'fine tune' their thoughts on contentious matters.

Your visceral responses with unnecessarily insulting language are more of a problem.

I strongly support you for expressing your opinions as long as you have some decent evidence to back them up. As mentioned before, it's the rather daft similes/metaphors and lack of respect for other people's views that you need to end in my opinion.

Let’s put it this way…….

Dear Pot

Yours sincerely


Kettle.

PS. I’m not a bleater, if someone wants to be insulting to me, then expect it back I won’t run off to the mods…….this is the quid pro quo is it not? Don’t like what I say ignore me, it’s not like I am on here every day.

This is not my board either and I am always respectful of that, I don’t make the rules. If I get a ban for quoting Krept and Konan lyrics, I will take the ban, no complaints and move on. The trouble is some people can’t move on can they?[/QUOTE]

Shut. Up.

 

[The Clamp]

“ Politicians get angriest with the BBC because it feels like being bitten by a dog they think they own”.



The fightback starts now! Here’s how the BBC can survive the Tory assault

Its flagship shows are looking shaky, its branding is blurred and its payroll is bloated. But as Nadine Dorries and Boris Johnson close in on the BBC, there are ways the Corporation can emerge from this crisis stronger and freer….


https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-...-the-tories-nadine-dorries-david-attenborough

A balanced view. Recognising the very real institutional problems within the BBC and the very real threats it faces from a Tory government desperate to stay in power. But also the strengths and achievements of the BBC and how it can fight back against political attacks on it’s integrity.

A very good read indeed.

 

[vegster]

“ Politicians get angriest with the BBC because it feels like being bitten by a dog they think they own”.



The fightback starts now! Here’s how the BBC can survive the Tory assault

Its flagship shows are looking shaky, its branding is blurred and its payroll is bloated. But as Nadine Dorries and Boris Johnson close in on the BBC, there are ways the Corporation can emerge from this crisis stronger and freer….


https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-...-the-tories-nadine-dorries-david-attenborough

A balanced view. Recognising the very real institutional problems within the BBC and the very real threats it faces from a Tory government desperate to stay in power. But also the strengths and achievements of the BBC and how it can fight back against political attacks on it’s integrity.

A very good read indeed.

Yes, read it. Incredibly strange that a Tory government that just loves to live in the past re Empire, Statues, Union flags and the BBC... wants to destroy the BBC ? Would a commercialised BBC find any reason to play the National Anthem ? strangely ITV, C4, C5 don't bother ?