Weststander
Well-known member
A big figure is meaningless without context though. It's £205m for a club bringing in more than £100m a year in TV money. Our spending stands comparison with most of the clubs down around us with just as many hits and misses. Established clubs can naturally spend less because they've already been upgrading the standard of their squad in previous campaigns. We were playing catch-up, big time. So, in the spell we've been in the Premier League, compared to our £205m, the spending is:
Aston Villa £140m - this season alone.
Bournemouth £140m (but already had 2 years of spending TV money under their belt).
Watford £134m (but artificially reduced by transfers in from Udinese).
West Ham £234m
Newcastle £160m (but after spending £50m the season before upgrading the remnants of a Premier League squad to get out of the Championship).
Southampton £158m (with a 5 year start on us).
I get your point and actually agree with you. Palace fans for example rattle on about we’ve had a net spend greater than Liverpool’s in the last 6 windows. Which is a spurious fact, because we had to start from scratch in summer 2017 in building PL quality.
My point is actually different. Within the £205m spend, we haven’t yet got a quality RB who can defend (if you don’t believe me, CH dropped MM, GP keeps dropping all his RB options), no CF to replace Muzza and a lack of goals from midfield.
The money’s been spent in a haphazard way. Winstanley imho did a brilliant job in the Championship years. The jury’s out now, three years on we’re in danger of dropping yet again.