- Aug 24, 2020
- 7,095
I hear what you say.I've read other people saying he's the one that brings the whole things credibility into question.
And I wonder if that's because, of the three, he's the one alleging the more 'out there' stuff: alien craft retrieval, alien body retrieval, government coverups, conspiracies and so on.
Whereas the other two have basically said they've seen shit they can't explain and it needs investigating.
No secret that I believe him. Bloke hasn't got anything to gain beyond maybe a book deal and a whole lot of people calling him a nutbag (not saying that's what you're doing, but others will be)
You want it to be true. If I am honest, so do I. It would be a truly momentous milestone in the history of mankind if it were.
This is why I would really have liked the whistleblower to have been Graves or Fravor, both of whom I found credible witnesses. The key for me, was that when they were asked questions, the answers to which they didn't know, they said they didn't know.
But Grusch didn't do that. He said things like 'I was denied access', or 'I can't discuss that in an open session'. If I recall correctly, he never once said 'I don't know' or its equivalent. He always alluded to being prevented from knowing - or divulging - more. This raises alarm bells. He may be an attention-seeker enjoying the limelight, and/or peddling a conspiracy theory of government cover-up. I may be wrong of course; this is just my own opinion.