Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Compact Digital Camera's - Whats The Best?



Mendoza

NSC's Most Stalked
My Kodak camera died and is being laid to rest after 3 years service and thousands of great captures of the drunken nights out, various land marks around the world, and amazing sporting moments

Price range, upto £200 I guess

Whats the best make? and can anyone recommend any models of said make?
 




Giraffe

VERY part time moderator
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Aug 8, 2005
27,221
You can't go wrong with a Canon Ixus. Had three different versions and they are all great.
 


smudge

Up the Albion!
Jul 8, 2003
7,376
On the ocean wave
I recently got a Samsung PL50 which does up to 10.2 megapixels.
Great for shoot & snap while on the lash, but great for panoramic views as well. 199 squid with a bit extra for the warranty so you can exchange for a brand newie of any model if you break it; from Curry's by the way.
 




seagullwedgee

Well-known member
Aug 9, 2005
3,066
two things worth noting.

1. anything greater than 8mega pixels is pointless. Domestic printers have not yet been made that can cope with anything like that level of pixellation.

2. get a camera that has a traditional viewfinder AS WELL AS the LCD screen on the back. I didn't (got an olympus mju) and it's a pain whenever you want to take outside pictures on sunny days, and you just cannot see what you're taking without a proper 'put your eye up to it' viewfinder.
 






Tom Hark Preston Park

Will Post For Cash
Jul 6, 2003
72,321
Got a Pentax myself and think it's BRILLIANT.

Have top disagree with your assessment there Safeway. I've got a Pentax Optio 43WR and I'm constantly disappointed with my night time photography efforts (sample below) :blush:



And no, switching it off and on again is no help at all. Though throwing it in the sea might work...
 


Garage_Doors

Originally the Swankers
Jun 28, 2008
11,790
Brighton
Good thread, i want a new one, Optical zoom 6-8 meg pixels, just point and squirt for holiday photos etc; nothing fancy,

whats the best options
 




Simster

"the man's an arse"
Jul 7, 2003
54,948
Surrey
The Panasonic Lumix is perfectly reasonable. You're probably best off going to Which? and looking at their reviews though...
 


Danny-Boy

Banned
Apr 21, 2009
5,579
The Coast
Yes don't go to Jessops' in Queen Street now.

They just laid off all their best staff over the last 2 weeks, just to save pension contributions I understand.

There used to be a friendly chick from Latvia there, sold me a Canon about 2 years ago and always helped afterwards with any problems.

Bastards....:US:
 


smudge

Up the Albion!
Jul 8, 2003
7,376
On the ocean wave
Couple of examples of snaps from my Samsung.
Like I say, good for views & good for snap shots.
 

Attachments

  • SDC11435.JPG
    SDC11435.JPG
    482 KB · Views: 141
  • SDC10118.JPG
    SDC10118.JPG
    218.5 KB · Views: 129




happypig

Staring at the rude boys
May 23, 2009
8,167
Eastbourne
The sony DSC w270 came out best in the Fucus magazine group test last month. I've had an earlier version for a couple of years for my pocket camera and it's just the ticket
 


Willow

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
1,673
Didcot
Have top disagree with your assessment there Safeway. I've got a Pentax Optio 43WR and I'm constantly disappointed with my night time photography efforts (sample below) :blush:



And no, switching it off and on again is no help at all. Though throwing it in the sea might work...

Looks like you had the flash in slow synch mode, thats why they are see thru.
 






ridda

Member
Oct 6, 2003
753
BN1
two things worth noting.

1. anything greater than 8mega pixels is pointless. Domestic printers have not yet been made that can cope with anything like that level of pixellation.

2. get a camera that has a traditional viewfinder AS WELL AS the LCD screen on the back. I didn't (got an olympus mju) and it's a pain whenever you want to take outside pictures on sunny days, and you just cannot see what you're taking without a proper 'put your eye up to it' viewfinder.

Yes agree with everything you said there, also you only get a cut down censor size with a compact so anything above 8 megapixels is a waste of time as they have to decrease the size the size of the pixels to get them on the censor.
 














Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here