Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Clubs Entering Administration



unnameable

New member
Feb 25, 2004
1,276
Oxford/Lancing
Why is Martin Perry taking the moral high ground on this issue? Is he suggesting that he would not have done the same had Albion been in Leeds United's or Boston United's situation? (See below for an extract from the Argus report.)

Meanwhile, Albion are backing a Football League bid to close an administration loophole exploited by Leeds and Boston near the end of the season.

Leeds went into administration 48 hours before their final Championship fixture, with relegation already assured barring a mathematical miracle.

A ten-point deduction was imposed straight away, confirming their relegation rather than kicking off next season against the Seagulls and other League One clubs with a ten-point deficit.

Boston, managed at the time by new Crawley boss Steve Evans, left it even later, going into administration during their last match at Wrexham once relegation from League Two to the Nationwide Conference was inevitable.

Now clubs are being asked at the League's AGM in Portugal on Thursday and Friday to vote for a cut-off date, after which the 'Sporting Sanction' for subsequent administration and relegation will be deferred until the following season.

Martin Perry, Albion's chief executive, said: "To reach a point where you know you are going to be relegated and take the hit then is wrong, so we will be supporting the amendment.

"The whole point of the Sporting Sanctions legislation was for everyone to operate on a level playing field. In the case of Leeds they exploited that."
 






surrey jim

Not in Surrey
Aug 2, 2005
18,163
Bevendean
unnameable said:

Now clubs are being asked at the League's AGM in Portugal on Thursday and Friday to vote for a cut-off date, after which the 'Sporting Sanction' for subsequent administration and relegation will be deferred until the following season.

Portugal???
 


The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
unnameable said:
Is he suggesting that he would not have done the same had Albion been in Leeds United's or Boston United's situation?
I'd say on balance probably not.

But then, would you be so prepared to defend the club's actions in the way that Leeds United fans have had to (subsquent Ken Bates farce notwithstanding)?
 






unnameable

New member
Feb 25, 2004
1,276
Oxford/Lancing
Re: Re: Clubs Entering Administration

The Large One said:
I'd say on balance probably not.

But then, would you be so prepared to defend the club's actions in the way that Leeds United fans have had to (subsquent Ken Bates farce notwithstanding)?

I wouldn't want to be in a position where I had to defend Albion in the event of a dishonourable course of action, though I would do so if I had to. I suspect that my attitute would be: my club, right or wrong.
 


pasty

A different kind of pasty
Jul 5, 2003
31,041
West, West, West Sussex
I would back our club if it happened, in the same way as I can't really blame Leeds for doing it either. The ruling has a loophole, and they took advantage of it. Who wouldn't in their situation to be fair.

I do agree 100% though that the rule needs changing.
 


Re: Re: Re: Clubs Entering Administration

unnameable said:
I wouldn't want to be in a position where I had to defend Albion in the event of a dishonourable course of action, though I would do so if I had to. I suspect that my attitute would be: my club, right or wrong.
OK, complete the following sentence:-

"Selling the Goldstone Ground for redevelopment without a new stadium being available was a great idea, because ...................."
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,017
Pattknull med Haksprut
Re: Re: Re: Re: Clubs Entering Administration

Lord Bracknell said:
OK, complete the following sentence:-

"Selling the Goldstone Ground for redevelopment without a new stadium being available was a great idea, because ...................."

it was good for Bill Archer's bank balance
 


ali jenkins

Thanks to Guinness Dave
Feb 9, 2006
9,896
Southwick
Re: Re: Re: Re: Clubs Entering Administration

Lord Bracknell said:
OK, complete the following sentence:-

"Selling the Goldstone Ground for redevelopment without a new stadium being available was a great idea, because ...................."


..............................We got a brand new Toys 'R' Us and JJB and DFS and Currys built in Hove?


Edit: The Burger King wasnt a good idea!
 


seagullsovergrimsby

#cpfctinpotclub
Aug 21, 2005
43,947
Crap Town
If enough clubs agree to close the loophole surely they can pass through an amendment to make the new rule retrospective to the 2006/7 season.
 




Starry

Captain Of The Crew
Oct 10, 2004
6,733
They won't be able to do that. Leeds sought advice from the FA, FL and planned to go into admin on the Monday but couldn't because they waited until the end of the week to get a signed legal document from the powers that be that a points deduction would be for last season despite us being all but down already because that was what the rules were.

The loophole stinks. Am I glad Leeds used it? On a personal club level then yes I am. It was there to be exploited.

However, it should not have been there to exploit in the first place. You can say that about lots of things in life though.
 


Captain Haddock

Active member
Aug 2, 2005
2,130
The Deep Blue Sea
"Selling the Goldstone Ground for redevelopment without a new stadium being available was a great idea, because ...................."

It allowed us all to go through hell for 10 years and counting!


What? :ohmy:

Oh :(
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here