Club statements today an insult to fans' intelligence

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,315
Living In a Box
I think supporters were lied to and misled so many times in the not so distant past that supporters have rightly become suspicious and statements containing bland, meaningless platitudes like those issued today do not go down well. We cannot expect blow-by-blow accounts of what went on but I feel we should be given some reasons for today's events, particularly since it appears that Oscar's departure had been on the cards for some time. How about a bit of honesty, Mr Barber? Or are you Bellotti in disguise?

What honesty do you expect as a customer, if you use a service which is how we are now seen as then they can test your patience to the point where you withdraw from that service or tough titties.
 






Brovion

In my defence, I was left unsupervised.
NSC Patron
Jul 6, 2003
19,863
I'm outraged that the club isn't airing its dirty washing in public.
I dunno, I think it needs to be out in the open. That's two seasons running we've reached the play-offs, played poorly and then found out that the manager told the club weeks beforehand that he wanted to leave. Obviously some stuff will be confidential, but if the broad reason(s) are out in the open then at least the new man knows what he's getting into and we won't got through this a third time. I broadly agree with Tooting: all we're being given is the anodyne crap that divorcing parents tell their young children.
 








TWOCHOICEStom

Well-known member
Sep 22, 2007
10,909
Brighton
I find it staggering that you think a professional football club would give anything other than the sort of statement they gave. I mean, what were you expecting - "Oscar has simply had enough of working with David Burke, isn't happy with the budget he's been given, had a first taste of next year's pies and spat it out and hated our new strip therefore we are glad to see the back of him and look forward to welcoming a new manager to work under the same conditions soon."
It's unrealistic, unprofessional and undignified. If they can't, for obvious reasons, tell the truth then a dignified "silence" is far better.

Totally agree.
 


Behind Enemy Lines

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2003
4,884
London
Agree with Tooting, it's very arrogant.

But the bottom line is that by now we know both Poyet and OG left because of the budget. They perceived it wasn't enough for Brighton and Hove "premiership ready" Albion, to continue to compete at the top end of the Championship. OG knows with the club's losses and adherence to FFP, it's going to take a miracle to go up. He was a very unlucky Albion manager, can now walk away, head held high, with most people in the game thinking he did a good job in the circumstances of chronic injuries with little money to spend on new players and players who really the club ought to have signed but somehow didn't. He's now in a good position for a good job somewhere in Spain or maybe even the Premiership, who knows.
 


spring hall convert

Well-known member
Nov 3, 2009
9,608
Brighton
Everyone's so desperate to have a scapegoat, it's pathetic. Try becoming comfortable with a bit of ambiguity, it'll do you a lot of good in the long run.
 




Man of Harveys

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
18,874
Brighton, UK
I'm sure TB will provide us with a reassuring communication in the fullness of time, just like he did last year.

Did he? What reason did he give for sacking Poyet?

I think the point here is that genuinely reassuring communication might need a bit more substance to it than "just keep calm (and keep paying)".
 




Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,339
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
Some fans, a vociferous minority who appear to live their lives like an episode of Eastenders.

I was more meaning that a sweeping political / corporate approach was what undid Bellotti. People trusted him to start with but as soon as the walk didn't match the talk he was found out.

That's not the situation here, not at all. The club is in a comparatively healthy state. However, fans who spent years being lied to, cheated on and generally treated like idiots are not likely to be the most trusting of fellers.
 




El Presidente

The ONLY Gay in Brighton
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
40,000
Pattknull med Haksprut
So why not tell us that?

I quit my dream job a year ago, there were some unpleasant issues behind it, mouthing off about them in public wasn't in anyone's interests, so I said nothing. I'm sure many others have been in similar situations and have done the same.

Oscar's unhappiness with some things behind the scenes at the Albion have been known for a while, but Naylor talking about them in the Argus or people breaking the story on a message board serves no benefit to our playoff chances, so it didn't happen.
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,315
Living In a Box
The test of this continuous merry-go round of managers might come when 1901 renewals come up......
 


Rich Suvner

Skint years RIP
Jul 17, 2003
2,500
Worthing
With the vitriol being spouted on this board this evening It makes you wonder if some people have ever heard the name Archer or Bellotti around these parts. Though I guess there were only 3 or 4 thousand of us back in those days whereas there are an additional 20 thousand now. Build a bonfire, Bloom out.

need to pull you up on that - there were many more than 3-4000 back then.
anyway....

has anyone actually considered that the 'resignation' was merely an agreement between all parties that there was a parting of company without anyone being unnecessarily sacked, with all the negative connotations for each (ie Albion sack another playoff s/f manager, Garcia sacked on his CV). it certainly seems possible to me that Bloom may have not enjoyed the emerging Garcia style - as many other fans didn't - and wanted a change of direction.

under such circumstances you could expect both parties to leave with carefully constructed statements that sing broadly from the same hymn sheet, as these do, and allow for both parties to save face. the club gets what it wants - a new direction - and Garcia walks away as the principled manager who decided things weren't quite what we wanted moving forward. I imagine he would also get a generous pay off at club discretion.
 






Tooting Gull

Well-known member
Jul 5, 2003
11,033
need to pull you up on that - there were many more than 3-4000 back then.
anyway....

has anyone actually considered that the 'resignation' was merely an agreement between all parties that there was a parting of company without anyone being unnecessarily sacked, with all the negative connotations for each (ie Albion sack another playoff s/f manager, Garcia sacked on his CV)

under such circumstances you would expect both parties to leave with carefully constructed statements that sing broadly from the same hymn sheet, as these do, and allow for both parties to save face. the club gets what it wants - a new direction - and Garcia walks away as the principled manager who decided things weren't quite what we wanted moving forward.

I suspect you're probably right in your guess of what actually did happen. What I would have liked is in that meeting someone from the club piped up and said something like: "Look, this is two years in a row, we want to keep these fans with us, how can we in all conscience look at them and give them another load of corporate nonsense that doesn't say anything at all. They actually care what happens here, and we are continually asking them to spend more money to follow this club. They deserve a straight answer."
 


Beach Hut

Brighton Bhuna Boy
Jul 5, 2003
72,315
Living In a Box
I suspect you're probably right in your guess of what actually did happen. What I would have liked is in that meeting someone from the club piped up and said something like: "Look, this is two years in a row, we want to keep these fans with us, how can we in all conscience look at them and give them another load of corporate nonsense that doesn't say anything at all. They actually care what happens here, and we are continually asking them to spend more money to follow this club. They deserve a straight answer."

Corporate organisations with a brand do not do that, the reality is this is what we have become.
 


Man of Harveys

Well-known member
Jul 9, 2003
18,874
Brighton, UK
I dunno, I think it needs to be out in the open. That's two seasons running we've reached the play-offs, played poorly and then found out that the manager told the club weeks beforehand that he wanted to leave. Obviously some stuff will be confidential, but if the broad reason(s) are out in the open then at least the new man knows what he's getting into and we won't got through this a third time. I broadly agree with Tooting: all we're being given is the anodyne crap that divorcing parents tell their young children.

The right thing to do clearly is to release an anodyne official statement, then to leak all the "he wasn't up to it/he didn't have a clue/he hated Paul Barber's long, boring emails asking for more theme night suggestions"-type dirt off the record immediately afterwards. That way everyone's happy.
 




Superphil

Dismember
Jul 7, 2003
25,679
In a pile of football shirts
need to pull you up on that - there were many more than 3-4000 back then.
anyway....

has anyone actually considered that the 'resignation' was merely an agreement between all parties that there was a parting of company without anyone being unnecessarily sacked, with all the negative connotations for each (ie Albion sack another playoff s/f manager, Garcia sacked on his CV). it certainly seems possible to me that Bloom may have not enjoyed the emerging Garcia style - as many other fans didn't - and wanted a change of direction.

under such circumstances you could expect both parties to leave with carefully constructed statements that sing broadly from the same hymn sheet, as these do, and allow for both parties to save face. the club gets what it wants - a new direction - and Garcia walks away as the principled manager who decided things weren't quite what we wanted moving forward. I imagine he would also get a generous pay off at club discretion.

Agree with most of that, and you've put it really well. However, in 95/96/97 there were still a number of those in the crowd that blindly followed the board, they didn't boycott when the rest of us did, they didn't walk out when we walked out, so there really were only 3-4k of us who were carrying out the direct action that eventually saw those scum out and DK in.
 


BadFish

Huge Member
Oct 19, 2003
18,194


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top