Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

certain groups of soceity should not be allowed to have children

























what worries me is that with new methods people will be able to choose the colour of their childrens hair and eyes amongst other things. Hitler and his band of merry men would be proud that their ideas are being taken seriously. think public school girl wishes that my parents could have chosen the size of my willy!
 


gruntage

Well-known member
Jan 14, 2008
1,220
Bristol
İbrahim Tatlıses;2830773 said:
Agree because humanity will pay for it in a few generations time. Those with poor genes are breeding like rabbits & those of us with better genes are far less promiscuous. The world is already vastly overpopulated & by far surpassed the limit of sustainability, without polluting the human genetic make up with genes from the pondlife of society.

I would propose a limit of 2 children per family. Rapists, murderers & paedos should be made infertile. Those with a history of unemployment or crime should be limited to one child per family. Those with debilitating hereditory disease should have professional family planning guidance to prevent pollution of the gene pool.


polluting?!

god, the Nazi's are back!
 






Peteinblack

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jun 3, 2004
4,143
Bath, Somerset.
I have, reluctanty, come to the conclusion that our chav underclass - the sort of sub-humans you see on Trisha and The Kyle show - ought to be prevented from breeding, because they are so utterly irresponsible in their attitude and behaviour, and have no desire whatsoever to make any useful contribution to society.

Incidentallly, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, who were socialists and co-founders of the Labour Party, also believed that 'degenerates' should not be allowed to breed.

Do we really want the likes of Karen Matthews or the local 13 year parents in ther news a couple of weeks ago (Alfie and Chantelle) to keep bringing children into the world?

Please don't tell me that they have 'rights', because 'rights' are meaningless if you can't also accept responsibiltiies.
 










Gilliver's Travels

Peripatetic
Jul 5, 2003
2,922
Brighton Marina Village
Lets start with those on benefits...We're already paying for them - why their children? ;)
Absolutely!! Then... how about those NSC posters who habitually write 'would of' instead of 'would have', and 'your' when it should be 'you're'. Surely a dead giveaway, yes?

Then, all those people who've come to the UK from other countries... Course, it's different for BRITISH expats, who automatically enrich any alien culture they choose to grace with their presence.



Eugenics? Count me in! I always fancied that Annie Lennox.
 








Alfred the greatx

Cake anyone, bit overdone
Jun 15, 2008
143
certain groups of soceity should not be allowed to have children

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First - public school boys who think their lucky start in life makes them better than everyone else.
 


Alfred the greatx

Cake anyone, bit overdone
Jun 15, 2008
143
İbrahim Tatlıses;2830773 said:
Agree because humanity will pay for it in a few generations time. Those with poor genes are breeding like rabbits & those of us with better genes are far less promiscuous. The world is already vastly overpopulated & by far surpassed the limit of sustainability, without polluting the human genetic make up with genes from the pondlife of society.

I would propose a limit of 2 children per family. Rapists, murderers & paedos should be made infertile. Those with a history of unemployment or crime should be limited to one child per family. Those with debilitating hereditory disease should have professional family planning guidance to prevent pollution of the gene pool.

My god that frightens the bloody life out of me.
Who decides who has the good genes and who is pond life? you, me, the BNP the tories?
Just try to think through the implications of what you are saying, you would need to apply for the right to pro-create, the most basic part of humanity would come under a government department.
I think the royal family are pond life parasites, do you? I also believe that the people that are breeding like rabits are the decendants of the brave men and women that gave their live to defend reason against the lunacy you propose.
No one group of people own this planet, it belongs to us all, even the ones you dont like.
If you think we should do something about the poor sods stuck in the lower working class then spend more money on education and you will be amazed just what that pond can produce, probably a lot better deal for society than the self appointed elite that thinks genocide is good for the gene pool.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here