Terminator1
New member
- Oct 4, 2008
- 152
I know they are both on contract but I would love to see Slade have extra money to compensate for the loss of these two.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
can we tout the sale of dixon and hawkins please
- Thread starter Terminator1
- Start date
wigman
Well-known member
How long has Dixon got left on his contract and has any one got any idea of what kind of money he is on?
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,327
Puerile signings for sure. Tho hardly their fault somebody was dumb enough to give them a contract in the first place. Why pay them off? Prob best to see them see their contracts out somewhere - anywhere! - well away from the first team 
mona
The Glory Game
If Barry Lloyd was responsible for the 55K signing of Dixon (my understanding is that he was), he should have done the honourable and resigned.
As for the lumbering Hawkins, his uselessness led to Micky's end.
As for the lumbering Hawkins, his uselessness led to Micky's end.
HG201
Proud Ruffian
i think Hawkins is worth keeping, but Dixon on the other hand.....
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,327
dixon is on £ 4800 a week with 18 months left on his contract
the hawk is on £ 3500 plus bonuses for another year
Superseagull
Well-known member
- Jul 8, 2003
- 2,123
I'm hoping this is complete made up bollox!
just remember he is a top goalscorer
Beach Hut
Brighton Bhuna Boy
To be fair tho, his gormless fucker bullet header own goal was the stuff of LEGEND
Indeed right up there with the clanger from Hinsh.....
1066familyman
Radio User
- Jan 15, 2008
- 15,233
Source ?
just believe it , there is a place with all info about contracts and wages ect its called the inland revenue , a pal who works for them can access all the info . fact
Ninja Elephant
Doctor Elephant
- Feb 16, 2009
- 18,855
haha, £4,800 a week! 
Classic stupidity on NSC. To be fair, Hawkins is shit but Dixon is worse. Both have contracts, neither will be stupid enough to leave without having them paid up, knowing they're not likely to get another offer elsewhere!
Classic stupidity on NSC. To be fair, Hawkins is shit but Dixon is worse. Both have contracts, neither will be stupid enough to leave without having them paid up, knowing they're not likely to get another offer elsewhere!
1066familyman
Radio User
- Jan 15, 2008
- 15,233
mona
The Glory Game
As they are under contract surely they could do alternative jobs for the club. Perhaps Dixon could do hand stands in front of Gully's Girls and let rip the occasional wolf whistle. Hawkins could entertain us by singing The Wild Colonial Boy at half time, followed by a comedy double act with John Baine.
pishhead
Well-known member
If Dixon is on that money then I'm just about to go to bed with 6 playboy bunnies.
Tom Hark Preston Park
Will Post For Cash
- Jul 6, 2003
- 72,327
severnside gull
Well-known member
Ever thought that there is still time for Dixon to come good?
How many have seen him play?
How many times was he included in the first team squad?
I know that in a world that craves instant success he rates as a miserable failure but in a more adult world where achieving maturity takes a little longer (and that world must exist - you only have to look through this forum!) he still has time (and a contract) on his side.
Have patience!
Hawkins attracted rave reviews on here at the beginning of last season. He (rightly or wrongly) kept Lynch out of the side and he didn't look out of place. He was injured and came back too soon (see also Murray, Forster, Livermore et al..........) and he made one horrendous (nay, comical) mistake. As a squad player (and I suspect NOT a massively overpaid one) he may yet have value. We should perhaps not be so quick to write off experience and remember the invaluable job that Guy Butters did in helping to bring youngsters through....I wish we had kept him for one more year in truth.
Having said that Slade may well offload them both next week.....fortunately I'm not the manager
How many have seen him play?
How many times was he included in the first team squad?
I know that in a world that craves instant success he rates as a miserable failure but in a more adult world where achieving maturity takes a little longer (and that world must exist - you only have to look through this forum!) he still has time (and a contract) on his side.
Have patience!
Hawkins attracted rave reviews on here at the beginning of last season. He (rightly or wrongly) kept Lynch out of the side and he didn't look out of place. He was injured and came back too soon (see also Murray, Forster, Livermore et al..........) and he made one horrendous (nay, comical) mistake. As a squad player (and I suspect NOT a massively overpaid one) he may yet have value. We should perhaps not be so quick to write off experience and remember the invaluable job that Guy Butters did in helping to bring youngsters through....I wish we had kept him for one more year in truth.
Having said that Slade may well offload them both next week.....fortunately I'm not the manager