hampshirebrightonboy
Well-known member
- Sep 3, 2011
- 1,024
So what do you think Caicedo's release clause would have been after we'd signed him - it would't have been £115m.Why are we all so anti release clauses in player contracts then? It allows the player to leave with class and dignity, and everyone's happy? If we had a put a release clause in Caicedo's contract we could all be sitting here now saying how we loved the guy, how he always gave 100%, blah blah blah.
And to yet to most on here we were right not to put a release clause in Caicedo's contract, and right not to offer one to Kudus. Seems to me people don't really know what they want.
MacAllister threatening to leave on a free unless he gets a 35m release clause = acting professionally. Caicedo asking the club to accept an 80m offer from Chelsea = acting unprofessionally.
Sorry, but that logic is just baffling.
No, the answer is its just business. It made business sense to give in to Mac Allister's demands and offer that release clause. And it made business sense to hang Caicedo out to dry and squeeze every last million out of Chelsea. So it's ridiculous to start ascribing professionalism and unprofessionalism to the individual players when the situations played out like they did solely because of our (Brighton's) desire to make us much money as possible out of the two of them.
And would have allowed Arsenal or anyone else to just come in and take when ever they wanted.
So you would have given up a lot of money and lost control just to save a bit of a nasty situation.
Think i'll trust in Tony's judgment.