Bruno

[jp1599]

Is Bruno the right choice or is Calderon a safer bet?

 

[Mellotron]

Calderon's safer, but if we want to go up, Bruno's the one.

 

[KZNSeagull]

Bruno. Am convinced we concede less when he is playing, but am prepared to be proved wrong!

 

[SIMMO SAYS]

They are both dodgy at times when defending but a threat when attacking so I'm not voting one way or the other

 

[BensGrandad]

I prefer Bruno and so apparently does Oscar

 

[VAL1850]

Bruno - Plus Calde is more versatile to have on the bench

 

[Eggmundo]

Go with Bruno and think it's great we have Calderon as a backup.

 

[Beach Hut]

Few weeks ago it would have been Calde however Bruno has definitely upped the ante so him for now.

 

[scooter1]

Bruno - Plus Calde is more versatile to have on the bench

This

 

[CorgiRegisteredFriend]

Have to go with Bruno. He played his very best when he first joined us and I think we are beginning to see a return to that form- be it gradual.

 

[Mellotron]

It was all about getting Bruno back in form and fitness after a year of constant niggly injuries. Now it seems he is - this is a non starter.

There is LIGHTYEARS between the two players, as much as I love Calde, Bruno is about 3-4 classes above him.

 

[Meade's Ball]

Bruno dips his boots in buckets of magic dust before taking to the field, and i don't the others have the password sent from the heavens to have access to those pails of the extraordinary. Whilst a creature of occasional positional chaos, i love to see the strangeness of a rightback occupying the left-winger's position when we break from corners. Managers trust him, and so do i.