Billy the Fish
Technocrat
There are clear differences from last season. A better keeper is making a huge difference. The side is much more settled and there's definitely not as much tinkering with the starting formation. (e.g moving White to DM)
This is why I have to have a good accountant. Rest of the point stands though.
Sorry, but as I said to Simster a 26 point xP swing isn't a statistical anomaly and it is backed up by what we're seeing with our own eyes. We're mentally stronger, playing it forward more, finishing better and getting luckier. And, yes, I think we're all absolutely ****ing loving it. I must have loaded the Premier League table on the BBC at least twenty times since the final whistle
Talking after the game yesterday with a couple of long time home and away Brighton fans and one started the conversation with the assertion that we are far more ruthless this season - I agree and used the phrase "more ruthless, less ballet". By which I mean we seem to be caring about the result more than the performance.
After a couple of games, particularly as we delivered an excellent performance as well against Watford, it could just have been the way we started but after 5 games it seems to be a bit of a pattern. In three of the five games we've won by a one goal margin having not dominated the game. Our xG and possession stats are lower. Oh, and we've had some luck. All last season with no luck at all, Now big slices, whether it was Burnley hitting the post or the VAR decisions going our way yesterday.
For me, at least part of this is down to White going and Duffy coming in. We've had to abandon the slavish adherence to wing backs. Yesterday we looked like we'd lined up as 4-3-3 to match Leicester, albeit that Cucerella was pushed up high the way Liverpool use Robertson (what a signing MC looks too) and when we needed to dig in an fight at the back we did.
It also suits our strikers. Two goals from strikers again yesterday and Maupay is in the form of his life.
In short, it seems that Potter has brought a bit more rugged football to go with the rugged look - without resorting to long ball nastiness or a low block.
I obviously love it but what do you prefer - the pretty patterns and missed chances or getting results from difficult situations?
I think you're wrong in your assessment, and are trying to find patterns when it's too early to confirm, and that factors such as luck and decision-making have had a bigger impact than you acknowledge.
I agree with those that said it was only against Watford that we clearly deserved to win. The rest is down to small margins, and this season they're going in our favour, whereas last season they didn't.
There are clear differences from last season. A better keeper is making a huge difference. The side is much more settled and there's definitely not as much tinkering with the starting formation. (e.g moving White to DM)
I agree with those that said it was only against Watford that we clearly deserved to win. .
There are clear differences from last season. A better keeper is making a huge difference.
Mike Bailey once said "I am in the results business,if you want entertainment go to a circus"
I would not go that far,but Potter certainly seems to have taken a more pragmatic approach.I would rather see us grind out results than play pretty football and lose.
Early days and good to see Big Shane back
Talking after the game yesterday with a couple of long time home and away Brighton fans and one started the conversation with the assertion that we are far more ruthless this season - I agree and used the phrase "more ruthless, less ballet". By which I mean we seem to be caring about the result more than the performance.
After a couple of games, particularly as we delivered an excellent performance as well against Watford, it could just have been the way we started but after 5 games it seems to be a bit of a pattern. In three of the five games we've won by a one goal margin having not dominated the game. Our xG and possession stats are lower. Oh, and we've had some luck. All last season with no luck at all, Now big slices, whether it was Burnley hitting the post or the VAR decisions going our way yesterday.
For me, at least part of this is down to White going and Duffy coming in. We've had to abandon the slavish adherence to wing backs. Yesterday we looked like we'd lined up as 4-3-3 to match Leicester, albeit that Cucerella was pushed up high the way Liverpool use Robertson (what a signing MC looks too) and when we needed to dig in an fight at the back we did.
It also suits our strikers. Two goals from strikers again yesterday and Maupay is in the form of his life.
In short, it seems that Potter has brought a bit more rugged football to go with the rugged look - without resorting to long ball nastiness or a low block.
I obviously love it but what do you prefer - the pretty patterns and missed chances or getting results from difficult situations?
Not sure it is a binary choice but if so I would go for results over performance. In reality it’s finding the right balance. There will be some games where the pretty football will assert itself and others where we dig in. Maybe we will see both within games.
Absolutely spot on, and speaks a lot to human nature. What the argument is missing is an acknowledgement that Potter was 'always' trying to make us play quicker and find that killer pass quicker, what we were doing last year wasn't a final product but a stage in our development. As we get better at it, so the goals and results will come. Its not a change in philosophy, we just weren't often able to implement it last year, now we're just getting better at doing what he wants us to do, and he's getting better at making it happen.
I can see a parallel with Piers Morgan defending his comments about Emma Raducanu being mentally-weak at Wimbledon. To paraphrase his defence 'I said she needed to toughen up, and she obviously took my advice'. He was wrong in his assessment of her as weak, didn't recognise that it was just a stage on a journey, and then uses the better result at the US Open to try and prove he was right.
I agree that we were a ridiculous outlier, it was absolutely absurd. The sheer number of games leaving us pissed off and shaking our heads was quite incredible really - and it was never because of managerial naivity or poor squad selection or whatever - just profligacy, or plain bitter, bad luck. That WBA away game - a perfectly good goal disallowed and TWO missed pens. Or Man Utd home - 5 times we hit the woodwork. FIVE! The less said about the Palace home game the better, and it's not as if that was an isolated case either. There were so many of these games. Sheff Utd at home who scored with their one attack when down to ten men as we failed with wave after wave of attacks. Both Fulham games we should have won (another marginal decision goal ruled out there), and so on.
We were frequently better than our opposition (sometimes battering them) and failed to win. It really was barely believable. The reason I was never "Potter Out" was because I had never seen such absurd luck/results in all my life and just was not prepared to lay the results we were seeing at the manager's door. As I kept saying all last season, I'd love to have felt it was reasonable to blame Potter and call for a change, but I just couldn't do it. It was this level of frustration that made last season quite unenjoyable at times, despite playing some lovely football, so I'm delighted at Potter getting what he deserves this time round.
Sorry, but as I said to Simster a 26 point xP swing isn't a statistical anomaly and it is backed up by what we're seeing with our own eyes. We're mentally stronger, playing it forward more, finishing better and getting luckier. And, yes, I think we're all absolutely ****ing loving it. I must have loaded the Premier League table on the BBC at least twenty times since the final whistle
Sanchez played in 26 of our 38 league games last season, so not sure you can call out the keeper given he's been ever present in our last 31 league games. We've had 5 games so far this season, we've had 18 different players feature in our starting XI - that is a fair bit of tinkering.
Mike Bailey once said "I am in the results business,if you want entertainment go to a circus"
I would not go that far,but Potter certainly seems to have taken a more pragmatic approach.I would rather see us grind out results than play pretty football and lose.
Early days and good to see Big Shane back
We still seem entertaining to me.
The Irish lad has always led from the front and I hope that he continues to do so, I agree it's early days, but we can still live in a dream world. So I still will.
The Monday Night Club on BBC Radio 5Live (started at 7pm) will be analysing Brighton tonight, so it will be interesting to hear their analysis of our season so far and their reasons for our points tally.
Sadly Chris Sutton doesn’t seem to be on the panel tonight as I always enjoy his uniquely blunt assessments. Looking forward to hearing Rory Smith share his thoughts though.
Not sure if this has already been mentioned, but according to Naylor, against Everton we had "66 per cent possession. Nine of the 14 shots Potter’s team had in that match, including blocks, came from outside the box. Only three of the shots were on target.
Against Leicester, nine of the 12 shots they had in total were from inside the box, with five on target, from only 37 per cent possession."
Not sure Micah Richards was very impressed with Charlie mentioning we're ahead of Citeh
Split on the use of xG and split on how good we really are - just like this thread, Lots of love for Potter though.
By refs or players?
Decision making by players is an absolutely huge part of the skill set, it's not a factor. And to make good decisions you need mental toughness, space and to be empowered to be direct where needed.
The Monday Night Club on BBC Radio 5Live (started at 7pm) will be analysing Brighton tonight, so it will be interesting to hear their analysis of our season so far and their reasons for our points tally.
Sadly Chris Sutton doesn’t seem to be on the panel tonight as I always enjoy his uniquely blunt assessments. Looking forward to hearing Rory Smith share his thoughts though.