Davidg1957
Member
- Aug 23, 2021
- 75
Went for 2-2 on the score predictor
Might not stay that way!
Might not stay that way!
Sorry, misread it. I thought you were being critical as I think a few posters are keen to blame Steele as soon as a goal goes in since he’s come into the side.I meant emotional-roller-coaster-wise. No one could have stopped Toney's shot. But Steele's wasn't able to relish his assist for very long, did he?
They'll wait till the summer so he serves the lengthy ban (to show how serious the FA consider it) during the summer so he misses barely any football. It's a sham and a joke. They clearly have enough to ban him already, and I highly doubt they'll ban him during the run in, so the summer looks nailed on.I know, but as he has confessed to 250 odd of the betting rules from his 300 odd charges, most people think he should be currently banned from playing. He will get a ban soon enough, but why does it take the authorities so long? Maybe not cheating, but certainly his behaviour is against the rules, so should he even be on the pitch today?
No, they're following the law. If they ban him now, they have to disregard the bets he has not pled guilty to. Or do the proper thing, wait and investigate and see if he gets an even longer ban.They'll wait till the summer so he serves the lengthy ban (to show how serious the FA consider it) during the summer so he misses barely any football. It's a sham and a joke. They clearly have enough to ban him already, and I highly doubt they'll ban him during the run in, so the summer looks nailed on.
No one ought ever be critical of a rookie keeper with only a few top-flight matches under his belt.Sorry, misread it. I thought you were being critical as I think a few posters are keen to blame Steele as soon as a goal goes in since he’s come into the side.
Gross seems a bit off it today.
Or ban him now for the ones he's admitted.No, they're following the law. If they ban him now, they have to disregard the bets he has not pled guilty to. Or do the proper thing, wait and investigate and see if he gets an even longer ban.
Then get sued. You can't just do that.Or ban him now for the ones he's admitted.
Then ban him again later .
Why not?Then get sued. You can't just do that.
Yes - but that's how they play, and it's got them where they are. They are a good side at what they do.Should be 4-0 probably. They've touched the ball twice and scored twice. Must've been getting on for 80% posession that. Only ourselves to blame if we don't win this.
I don't think there is anything in the rule book about having to consider ALL claims in one hearing.Why not?
Where's the rule that says that?Then get sued. You can't just do that.
Where an offender is to be fined for two or more offences that arose out of the same incident, it will often be appropriate to impose on the most serious offence a fine which reflects the totality of the offending where this can be achieved within the maximum penalty for that offence. ‘No separate penalty’ should be imposed for the other offences.I don't think there is anything in the rule book about having to consider ALL claims in one hearing.