Bearing in mind that their wealth and (potential) fame is likely to provide them with more than average opportunities / temptation, it seems like a sound idea.
To rape?
Bearing in mind that their wealth and (potential) fame is likely to provide them with more than average opportunities / temptation, it seems like a sound idea.
While i don't have "Facts" in written term. I think you'll find it's pretty obvious with most of the cases shown/written in the media.
You seem to be the one with difficulty in differentiating between the law and moral code: The law is a prescribed set of rules that we have to respect. Moral code is a personal set of rules, normally influenced by parental upbringing, by which we have a choice to follow.
You don't want to engage with me because, so far, I've provided more articulate response than any of your short quips, and you know that you're probably on a loser.
As for anger management. I'm struggling to see where on this thread I've responded disproportionality to your original suggestion that I need to undergo sexual consent training and some sort if moral guidance. That would be quite an insult to anyone.
Going to be on Radio 5 live after current interview.
The leverage that a woman's word has in court has far more weight on it than a mans ever does.
Your moral code might well be what your patents passed on or whatever. But, my point is that there can be a big difference between personal moral code and what I would term generally accepted moral code. The way we should conduct ourselves isn't always prescribed by ourselves, more prescribed by society. Some things are generally accepted, some not. Some folk will have morals which are generally not acceptable in the 21st century. Just because someone feels it is okay to act a certain way doesn't make it right in the eyes of society. In this sense morals are not subjective.
While this is good in theory. Still won't stop certain women crying rape or whatever when it comes to trying to extort money from players or trying to get free publicity. Knowing the British judicial system it won't be much help as our laws rarely listen to the mans side of the story
Congratulations on the silliest reply I've seen for ages! Opportunities / temptation for a legover of course, not rape. And learning when or when not it's appropriate to take the opportunity makes perfect sense.To rape?
What offends me on this thread is the self appointed moral high ground and presumption that all footballers are inherently thick with no sense of right or wrong, and that none of these lads will have had any sort of moral guidance from their parents.
Well the parents of your generation didnt do a very good job, so why expect the parents of current footballers to be any different.
Anyone without the conviction to follow their own moral codes and does things only because they think it makes 'society' happy is weak.
You do talk some crap. I follow quite a lot of codes because of they make "society happy." It's called respect for others. For example swearing is one; I pick and chose my moments. I keep a check on specific language when in the presence of kids. Does this make me weak?
I'm actually more embarrassed than proud about this. Are young footballers really that ****ing thick that they need to be taught these things? Some things about this sport really disgust me.
That's an appalling argument- I barely even know where to start.
As I think- thankfully- several other posters have now pointed out, the (1) reporting and (2) conviction rate for rape in this country is absolutely abysmal, due to a number of factors. I think it's lower than pretty much any other reported crime. The hoops that victims have to jump through, often in hugely distressing circumstances, just to get somebody to court for a sexual allegation, can be incredibly traumatising (this applies to both male and female victims, I should add).
The fact is, a jury, as a rule, would far rather acquit a guilty man than convict an innocent one. If you think for one second that this world is filled with demon females looking for males to entrap and make false allegations against, you are grossly mistaken, and also, I'd add, insulting towards the female gender as a whole. The number of false allegations is absolutely tiny compared to the number of genuine offences which occur, but which, in most cases, aren't even reported, because the victim knows it will be her (or his) word against the attacker, and that the evidence necessary to convict somebody will be lacking.
In the course of my job, I've dealt with dozens of rape victims, mostly female, it has to be said, and I think there's only been one of those occasions when I've thought it things didn't seem to be quite as they'd been made out to be. "Rarely listen to the man's side of the story?". Jeez. Don't you dare imagine that our laws don't favour suspects/offenders in these matters: in the case of rape legislation, they favour the defendant more than in any other sort of crime. I believe there are many, many more unconvicted rapists walking around our streets than there are innocent guys locked up in jail.
Yes, I guess that sounds like a rant, but statements like yours really make me angry. Imagine your daughter came home and said a footballer (or any other man) had just forced himself upon her. Would your first reaction be to put your arm around her and call the police, or ask her if she was making it up "for publicity"?
(Well done the Albion, by the way, for hopefully educating their youngsters, male and female, in the ways of human decency and respect).
Should be bought into schools along with sex education in my view. Anything to make people more aware of these things is a positive.
On paper you would think that this is ridiculous but whether black or white rich or poor this is something when a touch more of educating could go a long way.
Not obvious to me. I think our courts (now) are fairly good at deciding the merits of a case without taking one side over the other based on their sex.
Well done indeed.
However- I know I'm being unfair extrapolating on a two minute clip of what the players got from the program, but I sincerely hope that it covered respect to women, and WHY some things are not okay, rather than just 'not getting into trouble' - that's a bit how it came across.