JC Footy Genius
Bringer of TRUTH
- Jun 9, 2015
- 10,568
OK, so some debate here. The use of the word mass immigration is highly subjective. There has been no policy of mass immigration. Instead, we are part of a Union that allows for the free movement of nationals with the freedom to work and trade. This works both ways. Just as EU nationals are free to come to the UK, so native residents of the UK are free to move throughout the EU. This presents huge advantages to us and allows our young people to work and explore other countries and gives our entrepreneurs access to a wide.
In fact, the business benefits of remaining are huge; full access to the single market of 500m people means British businesses can sell to more people with the same rules as we have here, and they can grow more quickly. I say ‘full access’ because the ‘full’ bit is particularly important. Lots of countries have ‘access’ to trade with the single market, but they have to pay import tariffs and they face regulatory barriers when they do; we don’t have those, and that means that British companies can trade with companies and consumers in Berlin or Brussels in exactly the same way as if they were in Birmingham or Bristol.
Back to immigration. We seemed to be obsessed that it is a one way ticket. It's not. And even when we do look at EU Nationals entering the UK, the evidence shows that they pay their way and are filling vital roles. We do have a surplus of jobs - unbelievably so - and as I have pointed out, these jobs aren't to everyone's liking which is why they remain unfilled. And studies - many studies both independent and issued by government - do show that immigrants are making a net contribution. You might not feel it's net value, for whatever reason - political, social, cultural - but they do make a net contribution.
The argument also goes that we are full up. That we can't house and educate people. Yes, we do have a chronic housing shortage and yes we do need more schools and hospitals. So let's build them. I'd suggest the creation of more schools and investment in teaching would be far more beneficial to the long-term success of the UK than say the construction of HS2.
I'm delighted that you feel this is not a pole debate as well. It means that you see the merits of the EU as well as the shortcomings. The EU is wasteful - the whole Strasbourg issue is a total waste of £100million Euros of taxpayer cash. Reform is needed and members can force that reform if the collective will is there. And the collective will is going to be there. The fact that this vote is happening will have sent a warning out to the EU.
If we leave then we'll have to work with EU countries on the outside rather than the inside. That is not a good prospect. Immigration won't change - we'll still need some immigration to fill a shortfall of skills (nursing is one example I have used before). We may need less immigration due to our GDP falling. A weaker economy will produce less jobs, and it will also have an impact on wages. This isn't scaremongering. As you know, it's just what happens.
We'll also need to redirect funds to certain areas. Yes we'll save our £23million a day net contribution to the EU, but a lot of that will be swallowed up immediately. The NFU has come out on the side of the EU because UK farmers are waking up to the fact that they will lose the £8million a day that they receive from the EU through the common agricultural policy. If we are going to keep providing farmers with that subsidy, then we'll need to find what ever 365 x £8million is (a lot of cash) otherwise we'll see them go bust. As they are being squeezed for prices by our lovely supermarkets, they'll have to go bust or supermarkets will need to a) raise prices at the checkouts or b) import from the EU. Even if they do import from the EU, the government will probably need to impose tariffs which will increase the price of imports. Either way, it's all unnecessary expense.
I love this country. I have every faith in my country. I want my country to make the right decision. For me - even taking into account the things that are wrong with the EU - that future needs to be inside an EU, working together to solve common problems, create parity, trade as part of one strong bloc, whilst still retaining our rich heritage and cultural history.
I'll end on the Claude Junckers threat. First, it's a very foolish thing to say and doesn't help. However, I'm not surprised. The UK is threatening to leave the EU and compete with the EU. In competition you are trying to do better than the other side. I read his comments and imagined us saying the same thing to Scotland when they had their referendum. Were we saying the same things? Probably.
A debate where you and to be fair virtually every other Remain advocate seem to ignore the real evidence of past and current experience of the costs associated with EU membership (one being uncontrolled EU immigration) but always believe highly subjective economic forecasts which are notoriously inaccurate. Returning to the substantive issue.
Mass immigration is a recognised term and accurately describes what has happened over the last 15 years. There is also evidence that it was a deliberate policy ( Blair's, Blunkett, Straw's speech writer – mass immigration didn’t just happen; the* deliberate policy of Ministers from late 2000…was to open up the UK to mass immigration’. . . He was at the heart of policy in September 2001, drafting the landmark speech by the then Immigration Minister Barbara Roche, and he reported ‘coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended - even if this wasn’t its main purpose - to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’).
The above not including illegal immigration or the recent admission of even larger levels of immigration see NI numbers.. so 2016 still rising rapidly.
I won't bother providing links to reports showing the net fiscal impact of immigration (2001 – 2011) varies from negative costs varying from 0.3 Billion to 135 Billion as you have already decide there is a net benefit.
We just have to build a few more houses, schools, hospitals numerous other types of infrastructure services?
Not even clearing the huge backlog we would need to build around 240 houses every day for the next 20 years just to be able to cope with increased demand from future (ONS projected) migration.*
One years migration figures mean the UK needs to find school places equivalent to 27 new secondary schools or 100 new primary schools.*
The effect on the semi /unskilled job sector according to the Bank of England – every 10 percentage point rise in the proportion of immigrants is associated with a two per cent reduction in pay.
3 million plus EU citizens now living here increasing pressure on the NHS and we have no control on how many more can arrive in future years. How do we plan for the correct amount of healthcare or any other service if we can't prevent possible huge variations in rates of immigration?
This is the reality of our current situation with a wave of new relatively poor countries on the EU/UK funded path to joining the EU. The increasing pressures and problems associated with mass immigration will continue. Speaking of which according to a recent poll 16% of Turks are considering moving here when they join, approximately 12 million people. Some say this is unlikely to happen but the UK government fully supports Turkish membership and is spending Billions to help it become a reality. As are the EU.
Your comments on the Scottish referendum are interesting the Scots voted remain but support for self determination increased as did support for the Nationalist party. Another referendum will happen at some point. It will be interesting to see what happens to UKIP support and Tory Euro sceptic opinion if a similar result occurs in a few weeks time.
As we know continually ignoring the concerns of the public on immigration is a dangerous game see the rest of Europe. Even today I read Austria may be about to vote in a far right President mainly due to concerns about migration exacerbated by EU rules on open borders and paralysis over the migrant crisis. We could end up with a situation where the UK electorate votes in a far more Euro-sceptic government and the EU wishing we would have voted to leave. Fingers crossed.
*See BBC EU referendum Fact Check