Is it PotG?
Thrifty non-licker
Good old Henry retires. Great innings.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/40378783
Some great memories
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/40378783
Some great memories
Good old Henry retires. Great innings.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/40378783
Some great memories
British sports tend to have a "voice of [insert sport]" and Blowers was definitely the voice of cricket.
Along with Richie Benaud and John Arlott.
Will be sadly missed.
I have the cricket on in the car sometimes, and my two lads don't quite GET Henry, when his commentary shift comes round, and he comes out with something like "Oh, he's bowled him, has he? No. No that's four runs through cover. Fine stroke"
"How can you tell what's happening in the game?"
"You can't"
"Why is he considered good then? He's all over the place"
Difficult to explain, especially given that I entirely agree with them that John Motson is now utterly unlistenable, and the two I suppose are comparable.
Loved Johnston and Blofeld for many years. The narrators of my childhood.
Along with Richie Benaud and John Arlott.
British sports tend to have a "voice of [insert sport]" and Blowers was definitely the voice of cricket.
And Brian Johnston first amongst (those) 'equals'.
I know this is both controversial and almost blasphemous, but when it comes to cricket commentary, everybody seems to love an old duffer who sounds a bit clueless but actually isn't, yet is prone to childish giggles and thanking people for baking a cake.
I guess what I'm saying is that in reality, you could put any old slightly quirky, posh cricket lover, give him 2 decades presenting TMS, and he'll end up a "legend". I'm not saying Blowers won't be missed, but are there any of this sort of ilk who haven't had these sort obituary comments written about them?
I'm not entirely convinced, mate. I should point out that I have no wish to denigrate Blowers - he is a splendid, likeable chap who I enjoy listening to. I just genuinely believe he is easily replaced. When Jonners threw a seven, we saw exactly the same reaction. Two decades on, and Blowers is receiving precisely the same plaudits. Maybe it's just not that difficult to be likeable if you are that sort of character?Therein lies the point - 'of his ilk'.
His 'ilk' are the voices of legends; of verbal craftsmen who can paint pictures on the radio, and deserve all the plaudits coming their way.
It's the enthusiasm of the amateur, combined with the gift of the professional, separated by a great unknown; an undefined craft. And it's that unknown which marks the difference between a commentator and a narrator.
Blowers, of course.
John Arlott
Brian Johnston
Richie Benaud
John Motson
Barry Davies
Bill McLaren
Murray Walker
Even Aggers has that 'unknown' about him.
This isn't wistful pining for an previous time; a time of youth and fun, nor an era which no longer exists - these were/are genuine narrators.
And Brian Johnston first amongst (those) 'equals'.
It's the enthusiasm of the amateur, combined with the gift of the professional, separated by a great unknown; an undefined craft. And it's that unknown which marks the difference between a commentator and a narrator.
Blowers, of course.
John Arlott
Brian Johnston
Richie Benaud
John Motson
Barry Davies
Bill McLaren
Murray Walker
Even Aggers has that 'unknown' about him.
This isn't wistful pining for an previous time; a time of youth and fun, nor an era which no longer exists - these were/are genuine narrators.