Greg Bobkin
Silver Seagull
- May 22, 2012
- 16,028
If WE don't GET into Europe, WERE on the PITCH
Hopefully then TB is going to back GP with a top ten budget ?
I know this particular genie is now out of the bottle so there will be no stopping it but I don’t think people should be getting carried away. I have worked in an industry for most of my career where I have been set challenging targets which I have often met, but not always. I wasn’t sacked if they weren’t achieved. Rather it’s all about having a plan for improvement and mostly meeting the targets. It is way too absolutist to jump from ‘top 10 is a realistic aim’ to ‘we must achieve top 10 or heads will roll.’
I also keep saying it, but Maupay had a reasonable first season and started off pretty well this, but what ever happened with the 'bust up' seemed to be pretty much finish his season as mentally he never looked the same after. That is up to the manager to sort
Agreed. And the goals we need are already in the team. On the law of averages alone, a proportion of the near misses from Trossard, Lallana, Moder and the rest must surely go in next season.
If Leeds can come up and first season get 59 points that shows our shortcomings this season.
Their squad is no better than ours ( Bamford/ Maupay) maybe.
Yup. And Lampety's pace will raise our goals tally, not directly but by cranking up the tempo of our general play.
Maupay for instance is a better striker when he acts instinctively, the more time he has the less he scores.
If Leeds can come up and first season get 59 points that shows our shortcomings this season.
Their squad is no better than ours ( Bamford/ Maupay) maybe.
If Leeds can come up and first season get 59 points that shows our shortcomings this season.
Their squad is no better than ours ( Bamford/ Maupay) maybe.
Top 10 is probably another 19 points more than we got last season. That is a lot. A hell of a lot.
The only positive is that you can find the lost points very very easily when you analyse where exactly we lost them by looking at the horrific defensive mistakes (which largely disappeared when Sanchez replaced Ryan) and the countless big chances missed by Maupay, Connolly & Trossard. Sort those issues out and it could be top 8.
He's going to need to get his chequebook out just to stand still, so if he really thinks this, he's going to need to get it out big time.
Over the last 10 season the average points tally required to get 10th spot is 48.3. That is certainly doable.
However, changes are afoot. Before 18/19, 49 points would have got you 10th spot 8 years in a row, but in the last 3 seasons that level has climbed from 51 to 53 to 56 points. This is because we have had a succession of poor bottom three clubs.
Given Norwich, Watford and Brentford are coming up again there is a good chance they will struggle and so 10th spot might require the 53 points it did 2 years ago. I can't see our present side amassing an addition 12 points, especially as we are likely to lose Bissouma, and when our budget is well off clubs like Everton, West Ham, Aston Villa that are likely to be contesting that spot.
To do that we would need to cover the loss of Bissouma and sign a decent striker who would have to deliver 13-14 goals.
Each league can vary wildly in terms of what 10th can mean. Pretty much a 10 point swing over the last 10 years of the points needed for 10th (not what 10th actually got, just the points to finish above 11th).
Points required to finish 10th:
20/21 – 56
19/20 – 53
18/19 – 51
17/18 – 44
16/17 – 45
15/16 – 48
14/15 – 48
13/14 – 46
12/13 – 45
11/12 – 47
Average required for 10th over 10 years: 48.3pts.
Is this what they mean by an Echo Chamber?
This.
I said last summer that if the club didn’t buy a Murray replacement then we’d be in a relegation scrap. I’ve not changed by opinion.