Miximate
Well-known member
If all of the players were as good as we wanted them to be (all the time), they wouldn't be playing for the Albion. A little perspective is required.
Love it when people put two and two together and come up with a speculative pile of absolute horseshit
Brilliant yesterday.
I spotted that.
fixed and 12ft'd... https://12ft.io/proxy?&q=https://ww...5m-deal-noni-madueke-15th-signing-todd-boehly
I’m not sure you can argue with Brighton want more than 65m for Moises Caicedo!I spotted that.
I trust the Telegraph implicitly on football rumours.
Except for the completely guessing:
“After seeing a bid for Enzo Fernandez rejected by Benfica and being told that Brighton want more than £65m for Moises Caicedo, Chelsea have been forced to consider other midfield options”.
No one on the planet except TB/PB knows the figure or range, that’s if there is one in mind.
But where’s the £65m figure come from?I’m not sure you can argue with Brighton want more than 65m for Moises Caicedo!
Agree, I am saying it is probably factually correct!But where’s the £65m figure come from?
Just made up by liars, with no more knowledge than you or I.
I think Conte would prefer the £35m to spend on a new player than Bissouma whom he just can’t get a tune from. For Potter, it would be a real coup.Bissouma to Chelsea would make a lot of sense but I can't see Spurs selling. Would make them look very bad to sell to a direct competitor especially if he then performs better for Chelsea than he has for Spurs.
If we assume the journalist himself didn't pluck it out the airBut where’s the £65m figure come from?
Just made up by liars, with no more knowledge than you or I.
I assume that he did (lie).If we assume the journalist himself didn't pluck it out the air
Chelsea insider: so what sort of price for Caicedo?
Brighton insider: <raises eyebrows >
Chelsea: £50million?
Brighton: chuckle
Chelsea: £60 million? £65 million?
Brighton: hahahaha, oh my gosh, hahaha.
Walks away