Birchall

[brighton_tom]

why did birchall not play against luton? is he not match fit or injured? it seemed a bit odd that micky brought on doug loft as sub instead of birchall.

 

[Napper]

I don't think he is fit. Certainly not fit enough for 2 games in 4 days anyway. I'd imagine will start on sat though

 

[S'hampton Seagull]

why did birchall not play against luton? is he not match fit or injured? it seemed a bit odd that micky brought on doug loft as sub instead of birchall.

Probably just lack of match fitness. He played for the stiffs vs Gillingham last night.

 

[Mendoza]

How come he is lack of match fitness, yet Tommy Fraser turned up for the game in a huge plastic cast round his ankle and still played? McLeod was knackered after 35minutes.

He must have thought what has he done especially with a bumbling centre back playing in his position and a very terrible Cox also playing

 

[supaseagull]

How come he is lack of match fitness, yet Tommy Fraser turned up for the game in a huge plastic cast round his ankle and still played? McLeod was knackered after 35minutes.

He must have thought what has he done especially with a bumbling centre back playing in his position and a very terrible Cox also playing

*cough* Glenn Murray *cough* Leeds game *cough*

 

[theonesmith]

to be fair i thought coxy did very well on tuesday, he was pretty much playing both wings and central. reminded me of hammond covering chippies tired legs.

 

[Garage_Doors]

I don't think he is fit. Certainly not fit enough for 2 games in 4 days anyway. I'd imagine will start on sat though

Then why the f*** was he named as sub ? if it was no going to be an option. FFS

 

[The Large One]

Then why the f*** was he named as sub ? if it was no going to be an option. FFS

He may well have been fit enough for 20 minutes - but not necessarily 90.

 

[Uncle C]

He may well have been fit enough for 20 minutes - but not necessarily 90.

Then why didn't he give him 20 minutes?

 

[backson]

If he's not match fit, then wouldn't one way of making him match fit, be having him play matches?

Just a thought.

 

[The Large One]

Then why didn't he give him 20 minutes?

How should I know?

Just because he's on the bench doesn't mean he HAS to come on. And he might only have been on the bench purely because there was no-one else. Adams himself was probably next in line to be on the subs' bench.

It was probably better to give him the run-out in the reserves as it turns out.

 

[Bigtomfu]

He looks like a totally different player than the lythe athletic adroit midfielder from 2006. Up close on Tuesday he looked like he had three arses and six chins!

 

[Box of Frogs]

So Livermore was match fit and Birchall wasn't?

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

I do wonder why we have signed a player with only 102 minutes to his name in the past year.

 

[Don Quixote]

*cough* Glenn Murray *cough* Leeds game *cough*

would you like a cough sweet?

 

[British Bulldog]

why did birchall not play against luton? is he not match fit or injured? it seemed a bit odd that micky brought on doug loft as sub instead of birchall.

Because Adams likes signing midfielders to sit in the bench, He's been doing it all season so you should be used to it by now.

 

[sir albion]

Perhaps we can only attract unfit players to the clubwhy so many unfit players and injurys?

 

[Russell Slade's hat]

Because Adams likes signing midfielders to sit in the bench, He's been doing it all season so you should be used to it by now.

Nicely said, Birchill isn't match fit it would seem,

 

[BensGrandad]

Nicely said, Birchill isn't match fit it would seem,

The only way toget match fit is to play matches so I would have thought 20 mins against a defensive side like Luton would have done him good.

 

[Scotty Mac]

I do wonder why we have signed a player with only 102 minutes to his name in the past year.

because its got to look like we have done SOMETHING in this transfer window