- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,772
Is there a bias towards the big teams and if so, where does it come from ?
Is there a bias towards the big teams and if so, where does it come from ?
Is there a bias towards the big teams and if so, where does it come from ?
Is there a bias towards the big teams and if so, where does it come from ?
100%. Subconsciously most likely, but there is Bias by officials and by the media.
It’s not often you get hard evidence, but yesterday was for sure.
After our game not ONE pundit even discussed or asked the question why Man Utd had a corner in the 97th minute after 5mins injury time. We know for a fact we would not get that corner at Old Trafford if roles were reversed.
And the narrative became “great character from Utd”. Sickening.
Even before the game the media is galling. On Lamptey: “full credit to Chelsea for not standing in his way”. Just abhorrent.
But we are not a trendy big club. So we’re going to have to deal with and get used to this.
It's just the way of the world. The Premier League was always intended as a showpiece for teams like Man U, Arsenal, Spurs, Chelsea etc – teams that have global followings and are hugely marketable.
Teams like Brighton, West Brom, Fulham, Palace etc are bit players and they come and go from season to season. Our marketing potential is smaller and our fanbases are essentially local.
We all know that's the deal. The media will always fixate on the fortunes of those big clubs – and for us supporters of the smaller sides, the thrill is really all about climbing as far as we can and spoiling the party from time to time.
I think we get a pretty fair press. In seasons when we were defensively solid, but dull to watch, the media said as much. Now we're pacy and exciting – and often very unlucky – pundits give us plenty of credit.
In the scheme of things, let's be realistic: the bigger story is not Palace beating Man U, or Brighton deserving to beat Man U. It's "why are Man U struggling against teams like Palace and Brighton?"
IMHO any 'media bias' has little or no bearing on the passage of play. And if there is indeed any bias in the match officials, reckon that yesterday, if played in front of a 30k Amex crowd, they would have been far more swayed by a baying home crowd, in particular whistling for the game time to be up than by any perceived 'big team bias
IMHO any 'media bias' has little or no bearing on the passage of play. And if there is indeed any bias in the match officials, reckon that yesterday, if played in front of a 30k Amex crowd, they would have been far more swayed by a baying home crowd, in particular whistling for the game time to be up, than by any perceived 'big team bias. Sorry, yesterday's result was hard to take, cruel even, but we only tend to remember the ones we're on the wrong end of