pornomagboy
wake me up before you gogo who needs potter when
going on loan to fulham
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
going on loan to fulham
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Yer feels a bit generous to me. Don't like giving away decent players to a rival.With a ‘loan’ in the last year of a contract; effectively it’s a free transfer to that side with them paying all of his salary (£2m+)? He won’t be back but I’d have preferred a fee for an international with 113 EPL appearances. Nevermind. More money in the pot for a new left back/left wing back.
Yer feels a bit generous to me. Don't like giving away decent players to a rival.
Sent from my SM-G986B using Tapatalk
As much as he is a decent player, he is 30 years old and behind Webster, Dunk, Veltman and possibly even Clarke, Van Hecke and now maybe Colwill. If he is off to Fulham, a) that gives us an advantage as I'm 95% sure that he won't start against us and b) plays in a style that doesn't immediately suit him.
If he's going, I'm much happier that it's a loan so he can't play against us than perm where he can.
Looking at their forums you can tell a bunch of fools didn't see any of his top performances last season when he was called upon.
Too good for them is Shane.