Best Conspiracy Thoeries

[Norman Potting]

...... some even think it was vaporised by the use of direct energy weapons used to collapse the towers.......

Where does one buy these direct energy weapons, is it the same place that sells life size holograms of airliners? "Some even think..." that the moon is made of cream cheese but the Apollo missions proved them wrong (unless they were done in a film studio).

I do like my CT's to be rationalised without throw away reference to unlikely Sci Fi devices. If we can all remember what the original thread title was I will stick to my fave which is that the "Titanic" was swapped with the "Olympic" in some enormous insurance scam that went wrong. What is supposed to happen there is explained in believable terms. And by way the way I don't believe the theory either, I just like it and the reasoning behind it.

 

[Brovion]

Where does one buy these direct energy weapons, is it the same place that sells life size holograms of airliners? "Some even think..." that the moon is made of cream cheese but the Apollo missions proved them wrong (unless they were done in a film studio).

I do like my CT's to be rationalised without throw away reference to unlikely Sci Fi devices. If we can all remember what the original thread title was I will stick to my fave which is that the "Titanic" was swapped with the "Olympic" in some enormous insurance scam that went wrong. What is supposed to happen there is explained in believable terms. And by way the way I don't believe the theory either, I just like it and the reasoning behind it.

I'm trying to drum up support for my own view that England's 1966 World Cup win was faked. America wanted to use Britain for secret USAF bases, but canny old Wilson wanted something in return so he go the CIA to fake the final. It was so successful that they felt confident enough to then fake the six moon landing fakes between 1969 and 1972. It conned the gullible people of the 1960s, but we're obviously a bit more savvy today; I mean who really believes England could ever win the World Cup?

Interestingly since I've been telling the truth about 1966 I notice some Swedes have got in on the act (I think it's even mentioned on this thread) that the 1958 final was faked. Personally I think that's just the truth about 1966 being 'misapplied' to 1958.

 

[Norman Potting]

I'm trying to drum up support for my own view that England's 1966 World Cup win was faked. America wanted to use Britain for secret USAF bases, but canny old Wilson wanted something in return so he go the CIA to fake the final. It was so successful that they felt confident enough to then fake the six moon landing fakes between 1969 and 1972. It conned the gullible people of the 1960s, but we're obviously a bit more savvy today; I mean who really believes England could ever win the World Cup?

Interestingly since I've been telling the truth about 1966 I notice some Swedes have got in on the act (I think it's even mentioned on this thread) that the 1958 final was faked. Personally I think that's just the truth about 1966 being 'misapplied' to 1958.

I like this theory.

 

[beorhthelm]

Good link (presumably illustrated by yet another fake photo) but only partially quoted. It goes on:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also compiles a mortality registry of information obtained from death certificates, which is one of the sources Social Security uses for the Death Master File. The CDC's registry correctly shows a 3,000-death bump above average for that day in 2001.

"Another possibility is that the death was not reported to us because the person was not receiving benefits or there were no survivors' benefits to be paid on the deceased’s Social Security record."

not only that, the piece goes on to explain they have anomolies with too many deaths registered on the 15th of the month. it concludes with the statement "We make it clear that our death records are not perfect and may be incomplete or, rarely, include information about individuals who are alive". its funny when people link to proof and selectivly read it.

so [MENTION=17480]colinz[/MENTION] back to the question you should be able to answer, where are these missing people? i'll make it easy with a sample of one: where is the Akamai founder Daniel Lewin?

 

[colinz]

I was determined to not get involved with a 9/11 discussion because the other theories are so entertaining but I want to make clear that you are saying some people think that both towers were empty. I have no evidence either way as I was not in the building just before 9/11, but surely that theory must be based on at least one employee or company acting as a witness. Surely? One would do.

The theory is that both Towers (and possibly the other WTC buildings), had no Tenants at the time of 9/11.
In the lead up time as office space was vacated it remained vacant. The towers were then prepared for demolition with all fixtures and fittings etc, removed for obvious reasons.

Another theory is that the Towers were hollow and never finished, except for the public viewing areas, and the adjacent restaurant.
This would be an easy theory to debunk, because obviously it would mean that no companies ever had offices there.

 

[Gwylan]

The theory is that both Towers (and possibly the other WTC buildings), had no Tenants at the time of 9/11.
In the lead up time as office space was vacated it remained vacant. The towers were then prepared for demolition with all fixtures and fittings etc, removed for obvious reasons.

So, you're saying that Robert Eaton wasn't killed in the attack on 9/11. His grieving parents are putting on an act and the many people on this site who have raised money in his memory are contributing to a fraud?

Interesting view (moves away slowly)

 

[BadFish]

So, you're saying that Robert Eaton wasn't killed in the attack on 9/11. His grieving parents are putting on an act and the many people on this site who have raised money in his memory are contributing to a fraud?

Interesting view (moves away slowly)

to be fair we are still waiting for Colinz to tell us what has happened to the people who strangely disappeared and were never heard of again on the day of 9 11.

 

[colinz]

not only that, the piece goes on to explain they have anomolies with too many deaths registered on the 15th of the month. it concludes with the statement "We make it clear that our death records are not perfect and may be incomplete or, rarely, include information about individuals who are alive". its funny when people link to proof and selectivly read it.

so [MENTION=17480]colinz[/MENTION] back to the question you should be able to answer, where are these missing people? i'll make it easy with a sample of one: where is the Akamai founder Daniel Lewin?

My take on that article, is that despite the flaws in the Death Index it's virtually impossible to enter into the index the name of a fictitious person. Hence the reason for the thousands of 9/11 victims not being on it.

I wouldn't have a clue where Daniel Lewin is, or if he even existed.

 

[Brovion]

My take on that article, is that despite the flaws in the Death Index it's virtually impossible to enter into the index the name of a fictitious person. Hence the reason for the thousands of 9/11 victims not being on it.

I wouldn't have a clue where Daniel Lewin is, or if he even existed.

Do you want to answer the question on Robert Eaton?

 

[readingstockport]

Of course he doesn't. Actual facts disproving CT's are always discarded or ignored. He will not answer the question about Robert Eaton because to do so would show the delusion for what it is.

 

[colinz]

So, you're saying that Robert Eaton wasn't killed in the attack on 9/11. His grieving parents are putting on an act and the many people on this site who have raised money in his memory are contributing to a fraud?

Interesting view (moves away slowly)

I don't know what happened to Robert Eaton. So long as the monies raised in his name are going to the intended recipients, I can't see any fraud being carried out.

 

[readingstockport]

I don't know what happened to Robert Eaton. So long as the monies raised in his name are going to the intended recipients, I can't see any fraud being carried out.

Robert Eaton is reported as having died in the attack on the twin towers. His family and friends, including some on here, say he is dead. Do you think his family and friends are lying and if so then they are raising money on the back of a lie and that is fraud?

 

[BadFish]

I don't know what happened to Robert Eaton. So long as the monies raised in his name are going to the intended recipients, I can't see any fraud being carried out.

That answer is not really cutting it I am afraid.

 

[Brovion]

I don't know what happened to Robert Eaton. So long as the monies raised in his name are going to the intended recipients, I can't see any fraud being carried out.

So if I may paraphrase you, given your ealier posts: "I don't know what happened to Robert Eaton but he didn't die as a result of planes hitting the twin towers."

 

[colinz]

So if I may paraphrase you, given your ealier posts: "I don't know what happened to Robert Eaton but he didn't die as a result of planes hitting the twin towers."

Yes

 

[Brovion]

Yes

Well there's a whole new conspiracy for you to get your teeth into. What DID happen to him? Any ideas?

 

[Driver8]

Well there's a whole new conspiracy for you to get your teeth into. What DID happen to him? Any ideas?

Don't you think this nutter is best ignored before he starts seriously offending people?

 

[readingstockport]

Yes

So according to you his family and friends, including some on here, are liars and are raising money under fraudulent pretences?

I think you need to switch your computer off and take a long LONG hard think before you begin to seriously piss some people off on here.

 

[Titanic]

<mod hat on>

Can I politely, but firmly suggest, that the direct references to Robert Eaton stop... now.

It is clearly potentially very disrespectful and offensive to his family and friends.

Thank you.

<mod hat off>

 

[El Presidente]

One more lunatic comment from colinz and a long ban will be forthcoming.