Juan Albion
Chicken Sniffer 3rd Class
Why is it "beheading" instead of "deheading"?
Yeah you're quite right.
Grammar is the main issue when discussing the concept of somebody having his head cut off.
Behave
Bequeath
Relax, I know.Nobody said it was the main issue - crazy leap by you, Mr Stat. Just interested, that's all.
Relax, I know.
If you can't have a joke when discussing the concept of somebody having his head cut off ...
Just one of those qualms of the English language.
The origins of behead...
to decapitate, cut off the head of, guillotine;
Old English behēafdian ; from be- ‘off’ (expressing removal) + hēafod (see head).
That's very interesting. I can't think of any other cases where be- implies off. Maybe I'm just not thinking hard enough. But thanks for that.
That's very interesting. I can't think of any other cases where be- implies off. Maybe I'm just not thinking hard enough. But thanks for that.
What's the actual question here, is it to be or not to be
Tis true.Why is it "beheading" instead of "deheading"?
Why is it "beheading" instead of "deheading"?
Just one of those qualms of the English language.
Plenty of words begin with be- but I'm struggling to think of any other examples where it implies a taking away or a separation. Mostly they imply a positive action, such as bequeath with its concept of giving to, not taking away.
I love words and find them (and their origins) fascinating, but this one has me baffled. I'm sure there must be a linguistic expert on here who can offer some clarity.