Tell you what, there’s not much gets past them. Top police work.The court heard the offence was aggravated by homophobia, police added.
He's a bricklayer.Continually shouting homophobic abuse throughout a game at both players & fans results in him having to pay fines of £225. Doesnt really feel like a punishment that will sit on his conscience long enough to make him stop doing it.
Unless it’s a “drone” “flying” over GatwickTell you what, there’s not much gets past them.
I have heard of people having quite drastic changes of view in this regard surprisingly late in life.He isn't going to change, he's 30.
It will sit on his police record though.Continually shouting homophobic abuse throughout a game at both players & fans results in him having to pay fines of £225. Doesnt really feel like a punishment that will sit on his conscience long enough to make him stop doing it.
Good. ****.
On my Leeds homophobic chanting many of our fans said to get over it and scream for a policemen - didn’t stand up in court this time then…
The story in The Argus said he was in the away end, didn’t mention the team he supports though.I do hope he was one of theirs rather than ours. It didn't say.
Wouldn’t happen in Burgess Hill
He's a bricklayer.
.......
No, it's the shouting homophobic abuse that makes him homophobic.Wtf? So, being a bricklayer means he must be homophobic?
No, it's the shouting homophobic abuse that makes him homophobic.
I wondered why HWT thought it necessary to mention the guy's trade in his opening sentence.
Would he have done so if the offender was a college lecturer?
No, I was referring to the impact the sentence will have on him. The implication (from the bricklayers I know, and I know bricklayers) is that he is probably not awash with cash, so the sentence will be impactful.Wtf? So, being a bricklayer means he must be homophobic?