Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Ausies all out for 252 48.7 overs



Moshe Gariani

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2005
12,192
what we don't want is a NEEDLESS run-out...
 






Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,910
West Sussex
A steady over from Lee... the run rate required hits 6...

End of over 31 (3 runs) - England 137/3 (116 runs required from 19 overs, RR: 4.41, RRR: 6.10)

PD Collingwood 63* (80b 3x4 1x6)
IR Bell 58* (82b 3x4)
 




Moshe Gariani

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2005
12,192
Seagullible said:
please don't say that
it is inevitable though... England will definitely screw this up somehow
 






Moshe Gariani

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2005
12,192
"he's going to be caught"... :nono:

"no he's not!" :lolol: :clap: :clap2:
 






Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,910
West Sussex
7 off the over...

nd of over 32 (7 runs) - England 144/3 (109 runs required from 18 overs, RR: 4.50, RRR: 6.05)

PD Collingwood 66* (82b 3x4 1x6)
IR Bell 62* (86b 3x4)

Time for a drink... oh dear... wickets always seem to fall just after breaks in play.
 










Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,910
West Sussex
End of over 33 (4 runs) - England 148/4 (105 runs required from 17 overs, RR: 4.48, RRR: 6.17)

PD Collingwood 67* (84b 3x4 1x6)
32.6 Lee to Bell, OUT, there it is! huge breakthrough for Australia. Pinpoint yorker from Lee and Bell can't get his bat down in time. Hint of reverse swing and missed it by the width of his bat

IR Bell b Lee 65 (90b 3x4 0x6) SR: 72.22

Well batted :clap2:

Cometh the hour, cometh the man - as Captain Andrew Flintoff MBE strides to the crease.
 






Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,910
West Sussex
End of over 34 (3 runs) - England 151/4 (102 runs required from 16 overs, RR: 4.44, RRR: 6.37)

A Flintoff 1* (3b)
PD Collingwood 69* (87b 3x4 1x6)
B Lee 8-0-22-3
Lee got the breakthrough and is off. Back to McGrath at this vital stage. In the commentary box, Nasser Hussain would have stayed with Lee...
 






Moshe Gariani

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2005
12,192
Techno said:
Damn, crucial few overs now.

If we get bogged down and let the rate get to high, or lose a couple of wickets, then we're stuffed.
agreed... Flintoff lucky there
 




Moshe Gariani

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2005
12,192
Titanic said:
Back to McGrath at this vital stage. In the commentary box, Nasser Hussain would have stayed with Lee...
interesting... on the "do what the enemy want least" basis I'd have kept Lee on and tried to get another wicket...
 


Titanic

Super Moderator
Helpful Moderator
Jul 5, 2003
39,910
West Sussex
Moshe Gariani said:
interesting... on the "do what the enemy want least" basis I'd have kept Lee on and tried to get another wicket...

or keep his 2 remaining overs until the death ?? a fascinating conundrum.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here