If Numpty Barnes starts then we'll not win on Saturday.
Oh, I can see you really know you're football it must be brilliant to be so right all the time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If Numpty Barnes starts then we'll not win on Saturday.
No more or no less than any other player in the squad. That is how it should be.
Was that the old scrote who was flicking the finger at you as he was heading up the steps?The chap in front of me did the usual non-celebration when Barnes scored his goals. Other than doing the wanker motion. Then stormed off when Barnes was named man of the match!
Just like we were all aware that Barnes isn't up to itIt now seems we are all aware Mcsmudger is not up to this division,can someone please tell Gus
Not that it really matters what he thinks, I'm sure he's well aware that Ulloa has earnt his place.I think as good as I thought Barnes' performance was, he doesn't have the right to expect to stay in the starting
I don't agree, because games will be different depending on the opposition (are they going to come at us or park the bus), home or away, and whether we need players rested. Players simply need to understand that Gus picks the team, for whatever reason he feels, and that's that.Generally speaking I think if you put in a very good to great performance you can feel you've done enough to earn a start in the next game (assuming you train well, too, of course), and can feel justified in being a little put out that you've been dropped to the bench (again, assuming you use that disappointment well).
I don't agree, because games will be different depending on the opposition (are they going to come at us or park the bus), home or away, and whether we need players rested. Players simply need to understand that Gus picks the team, for whatever reason he feels, and that's that.
Regardless of what happened yesterday, Gus knows that Ulloa is the man. If Gus start Barnes instead of Ulloa against Leeds, then he'll have a reason for it.
No I know. But I think there are certain players that need to understand they may not feature in the next game regardless of whether they've played well or not. I'd think that would apply to Barnes, Kaz, Crofts, Hammond and Ankergren.Of course gus picks the team. I don't mean expecting to start necessarily means they will.
It is another vote from me for the eyebrows. Photos please.
Remember, one swallow does not a summer make.
Only 23, when he's 26/27 he will be one hell of a player.
Only 23, when he's 26/27 he will be one hell of a player.
Only 23, when he's 26/27 he will be one hell of a player.
How dare you come on here and post your opinion.I base it on what I have seen over the last 3-4 seasons.
A young player who scored 20+ at 21 and was our top scorer in the chamionship last season and continues to learn & grow as a player.
Yes it's speculation but from what I have seen it's what I believe.
How dare you come on here and post your opinion.
Yes you were wrong. But you weren't wrong because Barnes played well, you were wrong because you don't understand how important it is for us to try someone other than a knackered Ulloa up front. Gus made the best decision for the team, and its chance of promotion, without the benefit of hindsight. Gus is best placed to decide what's right, and you could do with learning that (and I realise I'm a patronising **** and I'm not sorry).Humble Pie: When I heard Barnes was starting, I thought Gus had made a BIG mistake. I was wrong.