portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,793
http://www.theargus.co.uk/display.var.1589490.0.falmer_council_could_appeal_against_stadium.php
Opponents of the proposed Falmer football stadium could form a consortium and launch an appeal in the High Court.
Lewes District Council announced it would not appeal against the Government's decision to grant Brighton and Hove Albion planning permission for the 22,500 seat arena on Tuesday.
But Falmer Parish Council, which also opposes the scheme, has yet to decide whether it will appeal against the decision.
advertisement
Now the council is taking legal advice on the likely outcome of a High Court appeal.
Parish council chairman Councillor John Burt said: "We have commissioned a report from the lawyer who advised Lewes District Council on the same issue.
"We want to see if there is a chance of going to the High Court and we are also consulting the Campaign to Protect Rural England and South Downs Campaign to see if there is a possibility of forming a consortium."
The issue is due to be discussed at a parish council meeting next Tuesday.
Stadium campaigners believe that without the backing of Lewes council - the local planning authority - a legal challenge by Falmer council stands little chance of succeeding.
Last week new Communities Secretary Hazel Blears decided to end a decade of uncertainty by approving plans for the £50 million stadium. Opponents have until September 4 to try to block the development.
Paul Samrah, the chairman of Falmer For All Campaign, urged: "I appreciate the issues and problems Falmer Parish Council have but it is time to wake up and smell the coffee - this has been going on for eight years and enough is enough."
The news that Lewes council had decided against an appeal has been greeted with joy among Albion supporters. The planning process is already the longest ever suffered by a football club in the UK.
If no appeal is brought, Albion hope to kick off the 2010/11 season in their new home.
The original decision to grant permission, made by John Prescott in 2005, was quashed in the High Court after it was revealed he had made a mistake in the wording of the document.
Opponents of the proposed Falmer football stadium could form a consortium and launch an appeal in the High Court.
Lewes District Council announced it would not appeal against the Government's decision to grant Brighton and Hove Albion planning permission for the 22,500 seat arena on Tuesday.
But Falmer Parish Council, which also opposes the scheme, has yet to decide whether it will appeal against the decision.
advertisement
Now the council is taking legal advice on the likely outcome of a High Court appeal.
Parish council chairman Councillor John Burt said: "We have commissioned a report from the lawyer who advised Lewes District Council on the same issue.
"We want to see if there is a chance of going to the High Court and we are also consulting the Campaign to Protect Rural England and South Downs Campaign to see if there is a possibility of forming a consortium."
The issue is due to be discussed at a parish council meeting next Tuesday.
Stadium campaigners believe that without the backing of Lewes council - the local planning authority - a legal challenge by Falmer council stands little chance of succeeding.
Last week new Communities Secretary Hazel Blears decided to end a decade of uncertainty by approving plans for the £50 million stadium. Opponents have until September 4 to try to block the development.
Paul Samrah, the chairman of Falmer For All Campaign, urged: "I appreciate the issues and problems Falmer Parish Council have but it is time to wake up and smell the coffee - this has been going on for eight years and enough is enough."
The news that Lewes council had decided against an appeal has been greeted with joy among Albion supporters. The planning process is already the longest ever suffered by a football club in the UK.
If no appeal is brought, Albion hope to kick off the 2010/11 season in their new home.
The original decision to grant permission, made by John Prescott in 2005, was quashed in the High Court after it was revealed he had made a mistake in the wording of the document.