What was with all the sniffer dogs at Fulham?
Sniffing for flares according to Stewards.
What was with all the sniffer dogs at Fulham?
Sniffing for flares according to Stewards.
Grass alertAnyone know what this about?
http://www.seagulls.co.uk/news/arti...o-kick-out-anti-social-behaviour-2637751.aspx
I was at the game and didn't see anything untoward.
they should focus their sniffing on skinny jeans instead
and beards.....i saw some people with beards
beards are anti-social......they are usually hiding something unsavoury
Just how wrong can you be?When is somebody going to stand up & say the world has gone mad.
Racism fair enough no room for it.
Homophobia there is no homophobia.We are the only club in the country who receive homophobic chants not because
our opponents are homophobic but because they think those chants will offend us.
Football is a very territorial game that is why we love it.it is also a very fickle game 1 week we are cheering a player the next we are booing him because he has left us to join another team.
Can we not just except the fact that sticks & stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me
M
Just how wrong can you be?
spot on.When is somebody going to stand up & say the world has gone mad.
Racism fair enough no room for it.
Homophobia there is no homophobia.We are the only club in the country who receive homophobic chants not because
our opponents are homophobic but because they think those chants will offend us.
Football is a very territorial game that is why we love it.it is also a very fickle game 1 week we are cheering a player the next we are booing him because he has left us to join another team.
Can we not just except the fact that sticks & stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me
i don't know , you don't seem to realise though.M
Just how wrong can you be?
Brighton aren't the only team who get homophobic chants. Watford & Man City do also.
Homophobic abuse is classed in exactly the same way as racist abuse in a court of law.
That's just for starters.
You sound scarily like a character from 1984.Which is, of course, exactly how it should be classed. Using hate speech is hate speech no matter how someone might try and dress it up. If people can't see that, there is no hope for them.
Oh good God noooooo not a man standing on a seat at Fulham ??
What does that scum of the earth think he's doing ? Who does he think he is ?
Life ban, prison term and £10, 000 fine what a ******* what an evil human being , we just cant have that at football matches.
I know youre not the sharpest tool in the box but try to work out why someone has posted something before immediately leaping onto your high horse, here is part of his post '' I asked her why she did this and just got looked at as if i had asked her something in a foreign language.''
Now he commented that she was black, lots of black people in london are african, lots of african people in london have only a rudimentary command of english, now i know you havent had the most cosmopolitan upbringing coming from hurstpierpoint , and the intricacies and vagaries of londons racial makeup will probably be unfamiliar to you, but this is an entirely feasible reason for what he posted about her colour, to highlight why perhaps she didnt understand what he said, it might or might not be , but its entirely possible, perhaps try and ask yourself these sort of questions in future.
Which is, of course, exactly how it should be classed. Using hate speech is hate speech no matter how someone might try and dress it up. If people can't see that, there is no hope for them.
I hate Pineapples. Can't stand the sight of them, I put a little jacket and a hat on one the wife brought home, but how ever I dressed it up, it was still a fricking Pineapple.