- Jan 18, 2009
- 4,891
The media ran both stories didnt they? Trying to make out there is media bias when both stories are there in the media is a bit weird.
This thread is about a UKIP woman being offensive.
If you think a labour front bench mp deserves a thread for protesting against Israel (not uncommon at the moment) feel free to start a thread about it.
To compare the two is ridiculous, and you know that.
This thread is about ignorance, a theme you are evidently quite familiar with, who are you to censor what people can say on this thread?
Comparison between the conduct of 2 elected representatives and how that has been portrayed in the media is entirely recant to this discussion.
Mahmood is ignorant, by protesting outside Sainsburys because they stock and sell largely British kosher produce means she equates the actions of Israel to British Jews. That logic is outrageous on a number of levels, and would be rightly condemned if the mob took the same approach to the conduct of Muslim States and British Muslims. This ignorant anti Semitic attitude has not been exposed in the media, far from it in some parts of the media she has been lauded.
The UKIP MEP is also ignorant, she used a disparaging off the cuff remark to refer to the ethnicity of a constituent. She has been condemned across the board and it was headline news on BBC south.
To state there is no bias in the media is weird in itself, as I understand it UKIP are an irrelevance, yet somehow they command the attention of the media like no other political party, and yet their conduct in the context of the expenses scandal, Rennard, Cyril Smith, Iraq war, economic ruin, cash for questions, political nepotism, comfort letters to terrorists et al they are lily white.
Then again I don't let the media lead me by the nose.