Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

[News] "Alternative" therapy



Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,089
Faversham








Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,089
Faversham
Remember folks, only when an 'alternative therapy' is scientifically proven to work does it become medicine.
Indeed. I prefer "Alternative to therapy"

Steve McQueen insisted on using laetrile for his cancer. He died. The NIH was pushed into spending a lot of money putting it through a clinical trial due to public pressure. It failed. This sort of stuff makes me very angry. I understand Darwin's law, but one cannot expect the public to be able to understand what is legit and what is not if they are desperate so they need to be protected. All this shit should be made illegal. Even Cancer Research UK is too soft on this dangerous nonsense. Cochrane has confirmed it is bollocks.

 






Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,243
Withdean area
I worked with someone, by day a qualified professional, who outside of work was full blown into healing, spiritualism, Icke, you name it. For decades from the 80’s.

He acquired and used the cancer ‘curing’ machine on folk with terminal cancer, generally spouses of friends or people who liked him through the spiritualist church.

I’m not exaggerating.

In each case the patient died anyway soon after.

[He didn’t charge a fee].
 




raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
7,344
Wiltshire
Indeed. I prefer "Alternative to therapy"

Steve McQueen insisted on using laetrile for his cancer. He died. The NIH was pushed into spending a lot of money putting it through a clinical trial due to public pressure. It failed. This sort of stuff makes me very angry. I understand Darwin's law, but one cannot expect the public to be able to understand what is legit and what is not if they are desperate so they need to be protected. All this shit should be made illegal. Even Cancer Research UK is too soft on this dangerous nonsense. Cochrane has confirmed it is bollocks.

I've just read the Cancer Research write up on laetrile. Yes, it's weird, quite softly worded although explaining clearly the negatives. They use the word 'caution' a lot...but for me it's not strongly worded enough. Would be better if they didn't give it the courtesy of a standard paragraph write up. Just say 'DON'T EVEN CONSIDER THIS!!" rather than listing the forms of application at the end.
 




Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,089
Faversham
I've just read the Cancer Research write up on laetrile. Yes, it's weird, quite softly worded although explaining clearly the negatives. They use the word 'caution' a lot...but for me it's not strongly worded enough. Would be better if they didn't give it the courtesy of a standard paragraph write up. Just say 'DON'T EVEN CONSIDER THIS!!" rather than listing the forms of application at the end.
That was exactly my take. They (research charities/MRC establishment) seem to be scared to offend people with 'alternative' beliefs. They may as well include a section on the power of prayer.

I work in 'actual' science and also edit a science research journal. It annoys me they way 'scientists' (some are 'only' medics) hype therapeutic approaches. One bad example of this is the amyloid theory. Decades of failed trials and it is still 'more evidence needed'. I thought science would be better than politics when I went into it 45 years ago, but we still have the equivalent of (well, I won't go there. Science and medicine should not be about politics. Full stop. The scientific method of hypothesis falsification is the only route to 'truth'. I was teaching this to a class of 16 postgrads yesterday. Guess how many showed up for the lecture? Five of them. Sometimes you just can't win.)

Best wishes to you @cheshunt seagull. The actual treatments for cancer have improved hugely in the last 20 years as I am sure you know. I am still waiting for the results of my prostate cancer biopsy. Probably 'OK' or they would have flown into action. :thumbsup:
 


raymondo

Well-known member
Apr 26, 2017
7,344
Wiltshire
That was exactly my take. They (research charities/MRC establishment) seem to be scared to offend people with 'alternative' beliefs. They may as well include a section on the power of prayer.

I work in 'actual' science and also edit a science research journal. It annoys me they way 'scientists' (some are 'only' medics) hype therapeutic approaches. One bad example of this is the amyloid theory. Decades of failed trials and it is still 'more evidence needed'. I thought science would be better than politics when I went into it 45 years ago, but we still have the equivalent of (well, I won't go there. Science and medicine should not be about politics. Full stop. The scientific method of hypothesis falsification is the only route to 'truth'. I was teaching this to a class of 16 postgrads yesterday. Guess how many showed up for the lecture? Five of them. Sometimes you just can't win.)

Best wishes to you @cheshunt seagull. The actual treatments for cancer have improved hugely in the last 20 years as I am sure you know. I am still waiting for the results of my prostate cancer biopsy. Probably 'OK' or they would have flown into action. :thumbsup:
Yes, a definite 'fear of offending' comes across...but they should 100% 'actual' science focused...what else is there really? 🤷‍♂️. Best wishes for your results too.
 


Harry Wilson's tackle

Harry Wilson's Tackle
NSC Patron
Oct 8, 2003
56,089
Faversham
Yes, a definite 'fear of offending' comes across...but they should 100% 'actual' science focused...what else is there really? 🤷‍♂️. Best wishes for your results too.
Cheers mate :thumbsup:
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here