Every season?Exactly, so somehow we've got to become a big club and win things and play in Europe every season. So how do we make that happen?
Every season?Exactly, so somehow we've got to become a big club and win things and play in Europe every season. So how do we make that happen?
Yes that would be great but it is a factor in trying to retain our best players. Can we ever reach a point where players are happy to play for us rather than leave for Liverpool?Every season?
Not in my view.….there’s always the opportunity cost to consider as well as the value of any expenditure (and careful management of those being precisely what delivered the results in the first place). Could equally say that it ‘makes our failure to spunk £50m on a PL-ready midfielder a bit silly’……..Kind of makes their ‘But how is this going to be paid for?’ stance on safe standing in the North Stand look a bit silly, doesn’t it?
Not until we pay Liverpool-level wages (spoiler - we won’t)Yes that would be great but it is a factor in trying to retain our best players. Can we ever reach a point where players are happy to play for us rather than leave for Liverpool?
PBOBE is on a decent wedge but not sure he’s going to offer TB upwards of £300m for a majority share……..anyway, TB is on record as saying his son is going to take it over when he can’t run it any more.No idea really - Maybe around £500 m? Not really enough profit to not only claw back his outstanding loan investments but feel good about the sale.
I doubt whether TB would ever sell outright, maybe his majority share ownership? Perhaps PBOBE might eventually take a majority share.
Think it would be nearer to £750m with the modern infrastructure in place.No idea really - Maybe around £500 m? Not really enough profit to not only claw back his outstanding loan investments but feel good about the sale.
I doubt whether TB would ever sell outright, maybe his majority share ownership? Perhaps PBOBE might eventually take a majority share.
Given that the figure includes the Mac Allister income, presumably the dates would imply that it also includes our record outlay on João Pedro as well.
That might not have had any impact on the P&L yet. Do new player contracts have an earliest start date of 1 July, even if effectively concluded in May and June?
The £29m fee [ @AZ Gull to confirm] is charged as a cost over 5 equal annual instalments.
Re point 2, only 1 years worth of a signings contract goes on the accounts, so not sure they will be that fussed if it comes this year or next - the same amount will be in both. It will just change which year it comes offI'm not banging on about wanting signings, but going through a line of logic, which i'm very happy to have corrected or added to
If we're going to spend big in the summer it stands to reason that we're likely to do it for two reasons
1) Other clubs will have to sell by the end of June
2) Financially, we would prefer to buy before the end of June, because then the figures will be on this seasons accounts, which we know will be very good, rather than next seasons, which although will probably be fine, we don't know about yet
Given that Watford included the receipts of the Joao Pedro sale in their 2022-23 accounts, I think it is safe to assume that his purchase is included in these Albion results:-
They better not take Buzz!!Our profits next year will be from Chelsea paying an extortionate release clause for our accountancy team - their pens and the grey filing cabinet in the corner as add ons
So sales are included as the full sale price upfront but purchases are spread across the length of the contract? That seems really odd.This is incorrect. Pedro’s 30m fee will have come off of the cash balance, but he’ll have been included on the asset register with a value of 30m. Net result: zero loss. This value willl be amortised over the 5 years of his contract, so in terms of the accounts he’ll cost the club 6m a year until either his current contract expires or he signs a new deal.
It just puts the prices up.Fantastic bit of cash to play with in the transfer window. It mind boggling
Sales would have the balance of the amortised purchase price knocked off to show a net profit/loss on a sale of asset.So sales are included as the full sale price upfront but purchases are spread across the length of the contract? That seems really odd.