I’m 55 and don’t think I have ever owned a £50 note.
The only time I have even seen one was when someone dropped one out of his pocket exiting the Amex which I picked up and gave back to him.
Turing was a proper genius, but Tommy Flowers was the unsung hero. Never gets the recognition, but that's probably how he'd want it.
But Turing was a genius beyond his work at Bletchley. I get frustrated his name is usually only associated it.
He is one of the most influential people in the world of modern computing and is known as "the father of computer science".
Completely off the scale genius who was was describing how software could be written for modern computers years before those computers existed.
He is the UK's Leonardo Di Vinci. Unlike Leonardo his "machines" actually worked and dominate our modern lives.
But Turing was a genius beyond his work at Bletchley. I get frustrated his name is usually only associated it.
He is one of the most influential people in the world of modern computing and is known as "the father of computer science".
Completely off the scale genius who was was describing how software could be written for modern computers years before those computers existed.
He is the UK's Leonardo Di Vinci. Unlike Leonardo his "machines" actually worked and dominate our modern lives.
I went back to University years ago as a very mature student after blagging my way onto a Computer Science Masters. What surprised me was it was mostly theoretical and you spend little time in front of them. I learnt about Turing and particularly his theoretical computer.
They first get you writing some simple C++ on an actual machine than you have to "re-write" it on a long piece of paper. That consists of single characters in a long line and instructions to a theoretical "tape head" on what to do when it encounters it.
Then the penny drops.
Not much has actually changed logically (under the hood) and he was describing it before the computers existed to run it. To add to that, although it would could take years to run any complex software on a "Turing Machine", if it wouldn't run on his theoretical version it wouldn't run on a super computer to be invented in the future.
In that he defined what was "computable" which is the foundation of what we now understand as software and the computers we need to execute it.
He is up there with the absolute best this country has produced before him and after.
His work at Bletchley although important historically was remarkably simply a "side-line" to his overall influence.