- Jun 27, 2012
- 14,649
Yes I know.
Exactly.
?
Why are you going out of your way to say you don’t trust them ? And don’t rely on them for news then ? Seems petty.
Yes I know.
Exactly.
?
Why are you going out of your way to say you don’t trust them ? And don’t rely on them for news then ? Seems petty.
Good - looking like a loan deal then. Slight upgrade on what we've got attacking-wise, and we're not tied down to a long term contract if it does turn out that his best seasons are behind him - and excellent news if he can recreate his top form. Have we paid a loan fee? £3M or £4M would seem reasonable - something in it for 'Udders and a chunk off their wage bill.Hmmm .............................. as a CM improvement on loan while the youngsters get up to speed, I'm in. Three, four, five year deal and a hefty (record breaking type) fee, and I've still got my doubts.
No, he's out of contract next summer, so a free agent.This. Then Huds can have him back next summer to bolster their League One promotion challenge.
He was woeful against us at the Amex.
Having said that, although I am not excited about him joining as he is way too slow, he is able to spray a pass and his shooting is good. He is an intelligent footballer.
I'm not going out of my way. Naylor has posted that he's 'working on another big Brighton story'. He has form for trolling, as he did when Dean Hammond came back.Why are you going out of your way to say you don’t trust them ? And don’t rely on them for news then ? Seems petty.
They're probably investigating the large hole where most people have a personality. Weird guy, especially for an Australian.
If it's just a loan I bloody hope we aren't paying £3m plus wages. That's over £100k a week for him.Have we paid a loan fee? £3M or £4M would seem reasonable - something in it for 'Udders and a chunk off their wage bill.
Question remains, why ON EARTH would Huddersfield loan out their best player? If he’s on 50k p/w that means we’d be paying around 2m in wages to him and then his contract runs out at the end of the season.
A loan makes literally no sense from Huddersfield perspective.
Perhaps Man City have a big sell on clause (50% or something) meaning that a loan fee and release will net them more money than selling him in the last year of his contract. Plus they’ll need to trim the wage bill in the Championship, he’d be their highest earner I’d have thought.Question remains, why ON EARTH would Huddersfield loan out their best player? If he’s on 50k p/w that means we’d be paying around 2m in wages to him and then his contract runs out at the end of the season.
A loan makes literally no sense from Huddersfield perspective.
Seen that - no idea if it actually happened or if the screenshot is an internet joke.Did we really do that with the pic? I assumed it was a hoax / joke?
Unless we are paying a loan fee.
Fitting in?
Quite possibly be the first name on the team sheet by Xmas.
I'm not going out of my way. Naylor has posted that he's 'working on another big Brighton story'. He has form for trolling, as he did when Dean Hammond came back.
Someone else posted that it could be a bit of classic Naylor, tantalising us. I simply replied that I won't be suckered in by his 'big Brighton story' and that I'll just read NSC, as I believe any transfer news will be discussed on here before Naylor reports it.
You think it's petty that I comment on Naylor, and I think it's petty that every time I do, you rush to defend him.
I asked you which new summer signings Naylor revealed before they'd been discussed on NSC. Can you answer that?
They're probably investigating the large hole where most people have a personality. Weird guy, especially for an Australian.
If it's just a loan I bloody hope we aren't paying £3m plus wages. That's over £100k a week for him.
Had to watch some of his interviews on YouTube after reading that - fairly introverted, states the obvious, certainly not one to be generating headline sound bites that's for sure. Seems like a decent, if understated, chap.
I wonder how the medical is going?
Did we really do that with the pic? I assumed it was a hoax / joke?
But it still makes no sense as he’s a free agent at the end of the season, I can’t work out why they’d loan him out, surely if they were going to get rid of him now they might as well cash in and sell him?
(Just seen post above, unless there is a massive sell on clause but even then I can’t see it)