superwomen
Member
major accident on the A27 near Manor Farm (the argus) - do you think this raod needs to be a dual carriageway ! keep safe
Manor Farm? Do you think the Argus needs to learn a bit more about the geography of Sussex?major accident on the A27 near Manor Farm (the argus) - do you think this raod needs to be a dual carriageway ! keep safe
major accident on the A27 near Manor Farm (the argus) - do you think this raod needs to be a dual carriageway ! keep safe
It was first called that in 1936, when the Trunk Roads Act was passed and the government took over control of major routes from the county councils.I remember when I moved down to Sussex in 1960 there were signs up along the A27 stating the forthcoming Folkestone to Honiton Trunk Road.....a long time forthcoming
West of Honiton, you join the Leeds to Exeter Trunk Road.One thing I've always wondered why did they only want to go to Honiton. It's in the middle of nowhere, there's a lot more westwards.
Ditto the westward section between Shoreham and Chichester. The whole thing is just a randomly-planned, piecemeal collection of roundabout-infested by-passes and road-widenings linked by country lanes. It will never change, not only because the country-dwelling Tories don't want developments going past their homes but also because the government are quite happy to see congested and fractured roads as it means loads more fuel tax.my Grandad used to bemoan the lack of a proper dual carriage/trunk roads across East Sussex, said it held the county back. you can see his point, feels like a backwater of the country despite being under 50 miles from London.
problem is, too many people like it just that way, so not likly to change.
My objection was to the only dual carriageway scheme that has ever actually been proposed by the Highways Agency for the stretch of the A27 at Firle.Ditto the westward section between Shoreham and Chichester. The whole thing is just a randomly-planned, piecemeal collection of roundabout-infested by-passes and road-widenings linked by country lanes. It will never change, not only because the country-dwelling Tories don't want developments going past their homes but also because the government are quite happy to see congested and fractured roads as it means loads more fuel tax.
Actually I notice Lord Bracknell's changed his tune a bit on this. He used to be opposed to making it a proper road as 'no one would use it'.
West of Honiton, you join the Leeds to Exeter Trunk Road.
I'll take your word on the suitability of the scheme, the proposed Worthing bypass route wasn't universally popular either - indeed I was one of those who thought the route should be further north. However the fact that there has only been one scheme proposed is indicative of the situation: nobody really wants to tackle the problem.My objection was to the only dual carriageway scheme that has ever actually been proposed by the Highways Agency for the stretch of the A27 at Firle.
This had no junctions with any of the side roads that local people need - and would have involved the retention of the current dangerous road for a very high volume of local traffic. In the immediate vicinity of Firle (where there are already two parallel roads - the "old" A27 and the current one), the plan was to build a third one. It was a ridiculous scheme and was opposed by almost everyone round here who uses the road daily.
You're confusing two quite separate points.I'll take your word on the suitability of the scheme, the proposed Worthing bypass route wasn't universally popular either - indeed I was one of those who thought the route should be further north. However the fact that there has only been one scheme proposed is indicative of the situation: nobody really wants to tackle the problem.
However that's all beside the point. My argument with you is that when we've discussed this in the past you were opposed to the A27 being a 'proper' road on the grounds that it would be an over-development as surveys indicated that no one used it as an east/west trunkroad. (My argument was that the surveys would indicate that as no one used it because it's shit). Now you're saying that it would be 'bad' because it would increase the traffic going past the Amex on a matchday.
Well yes I think it should be an alternative main road route from the Channel tunnel to Brighton and points west. But even if I accept your argument that it should be a predominantly local road the fact remains that in it's current state it isn't fit for purpose, especially the section between Shoreham and the west of Chichester (which I appreciate isn't the section under discussion here).You're confusing two quite separate points.
The first is that the A27 in Sussex is mainly a local road, serving relatively short journeys that are from one place in the county to another (eg Lewes to Sussex University, or Lancing to Brighton). It therefore needs to be planned and designed to meet these local needs.
The second point is that an end-to-end motorway-type route would be a strategic inter-city jobby. It would be used as the main route from the Channel Tunnel to Brighton, Portsmouth and Southampton. This would attract huge amounts of traffic off the M20, M25 etc - and would have the effect of clagging up the Brighton Bypass. Getting to the Amex WOULD become a nightmare.