Green Cross Code Man
Wunt be druv
Yeah, quite obvious. It was changed when there was a fatal accident from a side road on that stretch. Must be almost 10 years ago?
I've never heard of 10% (or 10%+3mph) as anything but apocryphal.
Remember, it's a limit, not a target.
Speedos are allowed to read under, but not over, so if you check it with a GPS, you will see that an indicated 70mph on your speedo is actually about 66/67.
All car manufactures for as long as i can remember have always made sure the speedo is 5-10% under the actual speed to eusure they can't get later sued later, can you imaging if it was later found they were at fault for many many speeding conviction, incorrectly banned drivers claiming loss or earning ect. It done to cover themselves, have you have you never looked at the sat nav and speedo speeds at the same time?
Hark at you on your high horse "i never broken the law on my bicycle"
But this costs you more as your insurance premium will increase for the next 3 or 5 years, when you declare the points.
You're contradicting yourself in your post. Speedos read faster than you're actually doing. The 10% rule is there to allow for discrepencies in the way your speedometer gets its information. For example brand new tyres have a greater circumference than very old near the legal limit ones therefore they say your going faster than you really are.
Sent from my SM-T580 using Tapatalk
All car manufactures for as long as i can remember have always made sure the speedo is 5-10% under the actual speed to eusure they can't get later sued later, can you imaging if it was later found they were at fault for many many speeding conviction, incorrectly banned drivers claiming loss or earning ect. It done to cover themselves, have you have you never looked at the sat nav and speedo speeds at the same time?
Sorry, I meant to say speedos always read more than your actual speed. In my defence I'd been on the sauce.
Gotta love 'I've never been caught before', as opposed to 'I've never driven over the speed limit before'.
Had an engineer come in to fix one of my machines about a month ago and he said he had been done on the M25 recently where they had a temporary 50 mph limit, on the official letter he received it stated he was doing 51 mph and had been fined etc etc. So, maybe they have ditched the 10% margin ?
I know someone who was caught there but doing 70 - travelling with someone who was not well and was just following the flow of traffic. Didnt get a choice of the course although first offence, possibly due to the amount over the 50. To be honest that sign is obvious but if you follow the flow its rare people actually slow down to 50, more like 60
Likewise. I got caught by a mobile unit in Dorset doing 34 in a 30 and was offered a £90 speed awareness course and no points or £100 fine and 3 points. I took the points and the £100 fine as I couldn't be arsed with trashing a days holiday to go on the course and the hassle of swapping it from the one offered in Dorset to one near where I live.
You can’t actually swap a Dorset speed awareness course for one held elsewhere in the country.
That's interesting. The letter didn't suggest that I could - but people I spoke to were saying "oh - just swap it for a more local one."
In the event that Dorset don't let you transfer to a more local session, no way would I drive 200+ miles to do a Speed Awareness course (that starts at 9:00am) and then 200+ miles home again afterwards to save £10 on the fine.