This morning I popped along to my local Speed Awareness course.
It was jolly nice of them to invite me.
Fella was talking about being aware of your speed in urban areas.
'Third for thirty'.
The theory being people trained to 'get through the gears, as soon as possible' are more likely to be in fourth, and therefore more likely to be driving in excess of 30, nearer 40mph, in 30 limits.
Also linking this to reducing your petrol consumption.
For those of us automatic drivers, he suggested, for urban driving, switching to the manual setting.
My question is:-
Assuming all of that is correct, are there any other drawbacks to driving an automatic in manual, for stop/start journeys?
I don't imagine it's that cost effective, if the gearbox falls out of the bottom of the car, because it's designed to be used only in 'D'rive.
It was jolly nice of them to invite me.
Fella was talking about being aware of your speed in urban areas.
'Third for thirty'.
The theory being people trained to 'get through the gears, as soon as possible' are more likely to be in fourth, and therefore more likely to be driving in excess of 30, nearer 40mph, in 30 limits.
Also linking this to reducing your petrol consumption.
For those of us automatic drivers, he suggested, for urban driving, switching to the manual setting.
My question is:-
Assuming all of that is correct, are there any other drawbacks to driving an automatic in manual, for stop/start journeys?
I don't imagine it's that cost effective, if the gearbox falls out of the bottom of the car, because it's designed to be used only in 'D'rive.