Only if you go on a sailboat or get someone to row you out and tip you over.Would a burial at sea be the lowest carbon footprint? If so I'm all for that.
My Dad was buried at sea by the Royal Navy, but even then, the little casket of ashes, had a lead base.Would a burial at sea be the lowest carbon footprint? If so I'm all for that.
Don't give them ideasSeeing this beneath the thread about Newcastle fans, I assumed it was about their owner's latest atrocity.
Assuming one could avoid using the lead base these days, surely the fish eating your body bit of it is literally zero carbon? Or am I missing something obvious here?My Dad was buried at sea by the Royal Navy, but even then, the little casket of ashes, had a lead base.
Throwing bodies in the sea, especially those who died of diseases, isn't low carbon, once the fish eat the corpse.
Alright calm down, Meldrew.I'm old enough to remember when just being stuck in the ground was good for the environment.
Dying of a disease and the fish eat you? I suppose fish and chips would be out of the question in the future.Assuming one could avoid using the lead base these days, surely the fish eating your body bit of it is literally zero carbon? Or am I missing something obvious here?
Sounds a bit chemically to me.
I’d prefer to be fed to ‘gators.
Considering what the water companies pump out with apparent impunity any time it rains, I'm not sure they would be too bothered. And the EA is massively underfunded, not too many questions will be asked - especially if there's a sizeable profit in it for someone.If you're interested, you can read more about it here: https://resomation.com/
The challenge the proponents face in the UK is two-fold: selling the concept to the public (cost is definitely a factor here), and persuading the water companies that what will end up going in the water course is essentially harmless (eg no dna). Will be interesting to see how it progresses ...