A 9K-seater Withdean?

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊



Obviously we won't need it tonight with the poor Plymouth away support but Coventry would certainly have filled a new away stand on Saturday.

I am struck by how this issue has got lost, understandably, amid all the Falmer deliberations.

All the back issues of Tim Carder's brilliant Albion Almanac dropped through my door recently and the first entry on the February edition was this:

"In the February edition of City News, the newspaper of Brighton & Hove City Council, Cllr Brian Pidgeon (Con, Patcham) is reported as "leading the fight against plans to create another park-and-ride site for Withdean Stadium by closing off part of Carden Avenue". He comments: "This is a most ill-thought out plan. People would be trapped in their homes. I am hapy for the Albion to build a stadium at Falmer but this proposed park-and-ride would affect everyone in our local community."

It's hard to conclude otherwise that this Nimby has won a victory over us in alliance with all the original objectors like Asda.

I'm genuinely intrigued at how this has happened.

Was this Carden Avenue park-and-ride scheme so flawed? It's just hard for me to take the claims of Nimbys that seriously after what they said about Preston Park Station being the next King's Cross disaster etc.

The politics of this interests me. As Lord Bracknell has indicated a few times on here, was the change of the council from Labour to "No Overall Control" a year ago a massive blow to us in getting planning decisions through the council that are favourable to us?

The fact is, this Tory Pidgeon now has a potential Nimby majority on the council to stop Labour pushing the Carden Avenue scheme through. The Tory councillors who "represent" me fought tooth and nail to stop Albion playing at Withdean and it seems to me that they and Pidgeon would get the Tory group's support. The Greens are bloody useless on any Albion issue and that just leaves the Liberal Democrats who seem to me the first to sign up to any Nimby protest going. That's an alliance that can outvote all the pro-Albion Labour councillors on Brighton and Hove Council.

It's all very sad. I am very thankful that the council was still solidly Labour in 1998-9, otherwise would the council have had the political will to face down the Tories and the SWEAT campaigners?

I can't help feeling Albion fans missed a trick a year ago by not turning out more solidly to ensure a Labour majority on the council. The first consequence of this has been that Bodfish and Co. now need the support of other political groups to push controversial planning proposals through. Maybe they don't want to disrupt the (mostly) cross-party unity behind Falmer to push other Albion plans that would create big divisions.

The reality of it is, I think the Labour group have now been forced to abandon the Carden Avenue plan. Where the Tories and SWEAT lost in 1998-9, the Tories and the likes of Asda have won in 2004.

While the Carden Avenue plan is not perfect, there appears to be no obvious alternative to it within the Brighton and Hove area (sound a familar problem?). There is a clear danger that we could be stuck with the lower revenues from a 7k stadium for years to come now until Falmer.

The moral of the story is, if you are an Albion fan, think carefully before you use your vote in local elections in future!
 
Last edited:




SI 4 BHA

Active member
Nov 12, 2003
736
westdene, brighton
I really don't think party politics comes into the decision not to use Carden Ave as a park & ride site. Any one who has the unfortunate experience to use Asda on a Saturday afternoon will know that Crowhust Road is more often than not blocked with traffic trying to get into Asda. Crowhust Road is simply not capable of carrying the through traffic from Carden Ave on Saturdays. It looks like a good idea if you look at a map, but in practice it would be chaos.

What is surprising that apparently no other site in Brighton/Hove can be found for a park & ride site for a fairly small number of vehicles. What about using Sussex Uni for this as I understand parking will be available there when Falmer is completed.

It seems to me that the club is not really persuing the extra seats, presumably as we haven't got the money to carry out this short term development and that is the main reason nothing is happening at present.

In any case, why do the extra seats have to be linked to extra park & ride? I know this is what the council wants but can't we appeal against this restriction. What other clubs have to jump through such ridiculous hoops each time they make a modest increase in their capacity?
 


Dancin Ninja BHA

Well-known member
Jul 6, 2003
2,256
London Irish said:
Obviously we won't need it tonight with the poor Plymouth away support but Coventry would certainly have filled a new away stand on Saturday.

You have the cheek to criticise someone yesterday for not checking their facts (something about animals in the wild having gay tendancies or something equally tedious as that) and then you come out with a stupid statement like "the poor Plymouth support"......think you'll find they'll have an excellent turnout tonight
 


Curious Orange

Punxsatawney Phil
Jul 5, 2003
10,219
On NSC for over two decades...
My understanding is that the council were supposed to be identifying an alternative site for the Park & Ride in exchange for the Albion dropping the Carden Avenue proposal. There doesn't appear to have been much activity from the Council in respect of this since, which isn't to say they've been doing nothing about it.
 


b.w.2.

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2004
5,189
The key point raised above is that the club are not really pushing for the extra seats... if they were, then I'm sure a P&R site could be found... not impressed with the club on this one, and do not believe it's down to the new council structure... :(
 




graz126

New member
Oct 17, 2003
4,146
doncaster
in my experiance plymouth have a very good away support. and coventry dont. but then i suspect you may be joking.
 


bobbycodpiece

New member
Jul 25, 2004
77
Brighton
Braypool (Patcham) has been suggested for Park & Ride, but the Withdean Councillors Ann & Ken Norman who so "wonderfully" supported Falmer on the BHA web site don't want to encourage anything that might result in the redevelopment of Withdean.....which in my opinion would be a good idea....even if it were only for the short term.
 


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
35,982
it is my opinion that the club is not pushing the seat increase incase it is detremental to our Falmer case. we dont want to say weve got a 7K stadium, so we need to move, then suddenly it becomes 9k... then 6 months later and a bit of jiggery pokery its 11k. it would play to the argument that Withdean is a viable alternative.
 




Re: Re: A 9K-seater Withdean?

Dancin Ninja BHA said:
You have the cheek to criticise someone yesterday for not checking their facts (something about animals in the wild having gay tendancies or something equally tedious as that) and then you come out with a stupid statement like "the poor Plymouth support"......think you'll find they'll have an excellent turnout tonight

Do you anything to say about the planning issues which is the subject of 99 per cent of my post? No, sadly this issue is a bit too complex for the level of your intellect. But you do appear weirdly obsessed, it seems, but it's nice having a fan club, so please carry on.
 


SI 4 BHA said:
I really don't think party politics comes into the decision not to use Carden Ave as a park & ride site. It looks like a good idea if you look at a map, but in practice it would be chaos.

This is a good answer to my post if your assessment of the merits of the proposal is correct.

What I find odd, though, about this is that the Albion's proposal for Carden Avenue would only have been submitted after careful joint work with the relevant planners. How could they have miscalculated so badly then? It seems barely conceivable that our council allies would have allowed such an unworkable proposal to reach the committee stage.

I'm not saying you're wrong SI 4 BHA, but I'd be interested to hear others' assessment of the workability of the Carden Ave plans.
 
Last edited:


The Large One

Who's Next?
Jul 7, 2003
52,343
97.2FM
I think that both the council and the club under-estimated the level of interest/hostility in the park & ride scheme in Hollingbury.

I also suspect that the club were expecting a decision on Falmer by now. If we had got a YES by now, there could have been a possible short-term injection of revenue which facilitated the construction of the 2k seats.

As it is, we are in limbo, with the club possibly spending a lot of time and resources on the 2nd Public Inquiry. The club now has to find an extra £50k? £100k? to finance this - and this bites into the money put aside for the seats.
 




Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
SI 4 BHA said:
. What about using Sussex Uni for this as I understand parking will be available there when Falmer is completed.

I have never seen a reply that tackles this suggestion, sounds like the most logical and feasible solution, if a little far out of town. This could be an advantage if the seats are to be used for opposition fans, they could make it a condition of entry that away fans have to park and ride from there and maybe have the ticket stamped on the bus?

Would help keep some of the "hooligan's who follow football" out of Brighton town centre as well :lol:
 


bobbycodpiece

New member
Jul 25, 2004
77
Brighton
Icy Gull said:
I have never seen a reply that tackles this suggestion, sounds like the most logical and feasible solution, if a little far out of town. This could be an advantage if the seats are to be used for opposition fans, they could make it a condition of entry that away fans have to park and ride from there and maybe have the ticket stamped on the bus?

Would help keep some of the "hooligan's who follow football" out of Brighton town centre as well :lol:

.....the Albion would need to pay Sx for the carpark use, as they are not going to let them use private property for nothing.....have they got any spare funds for this ?
 


Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
bobbycodpiece said:
.....the Albion would need to pay Sx for the carpark use, as they are not going to let them use private property for nothing.....have they got any spare funds for this ?

If that was the only obstacle and couldn't be overcome maybe we should just forget Falmer??
 






Icy Gull

Back on the rollercoaster
Jul 5, 2003
72,015
An extra 2,000 seats x 23? games = over 1 million . How much would use of a car park cost? It seems we keep making excuses for why we shouldn't do something which really isn't the way to go if we are hope to be a decent sized club again.

What's the expression "spoiling the ship for a hapworth of tar"? I don't want to knock but I sometimes wonder if Div 1 football and Falmer really is a bridge too far for the current board. Sacrilege I know :blush:
 


bobbycodpiece

New member
Jul 25, 2004
77
Brighton
Icy Gull said:
An extra 2,000 seats x 23? games = over 1 million . How much would use of a car park cost? It seems we keep making excuses for why we shouldn't do something which really isn't the way to go if we are hope to be a decent sized club again.

What's the expression "spoiling the ship for a hapworth of tar"? I don't want to knock but I sometimes wonder if Div 1 football and Falmer really is a bridge too far for the current board. Sacrilege I know :blush:

...not sacrilege...reality perhaps ? good job there's a game on at the moment or I'd be accused of being a NIMBY or "not a true fan" !!
 


Robot Chicken

Seriously?
Jul 5, 2003
13,154
Chicken World
The Large One said:
I think that both the council and the club under-estimated the level of interest/hostility in the park & ride scheme in Hollingbury.

I also suspect that the club were expecting a decision on Falmer by now. If we had got a YES by now, there could have been a possible short-term injection of revenue which facilitated the construction of the 2k seats.

As it is, we are in limbo, with the club possibly spending a lot of time and resources on the 2nd Public Inquiry. The club now has to find an extra £50k? £100k? to finance this - and this bites into the money put aside for the seats.

I heard it was more like £500k
 






Robot Chicken

Seriously?
Jul 5, 2003
13,154
Chicken World
We pretty much always sell out, but it's the odd hundred or so seats always remain empty. These must be comps and no-shows.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top